From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Why?:Reinvent the wheel
|
Score: 12 wheelie loving consumers. 
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister in Chains
|
For: 12
|
 SelfNom and For. Here's a page I had wanted to nom, amongst my incarnation as a dancing rapist. It's one that I think works well. Hope you will enjoy it. Aleister in Chains 1:10 28 5 MMX- For. Ahh! Its a great story of an experience, just in case such experience happens to any one else. Excellent as is. Funnybony
   10:14, May 28 10:14, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:57, 28 May 2010
- Certainly --I'mthedaddy 23:19, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
- For. lol 203.171.196.191 00:21, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A surprisingly interesting story with bits of humor sprinkled all over it. Much like my toilet seat in the morning. Good work! Yoyoddd 06:08, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Aleister in Chains. —Pelozurian (talk) 06:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- For. --Matfen 20:39, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
- For. ha 153.107.33.152 01:36, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. I want to vote against, but I don't want to look like the party pooper.
 -Maniac1075Complain Here 07:23, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. A good, solid piece by Al. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:58, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- For. This is the very best story I've read in awhile. Maybe I should read more? No. ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*
 (talk) (stalk) Π ~  ~ 19 Jun 2010 ~ 19:52 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
- Had a review by Funnybony, who peed all over it without even lifting the lid. Splattered all over. Al des chains 1:11 28 5 MMX
- Abstaint. I think it could worked better without resorting to a first person narrative approach. Sorry.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:57, May 29, 2010 (UTC)
- The arc of the storyline could have only worked first person, at least how it played out in my concept of the page. Some pages really don't need first person points-of-view. This one, however, would be a totally different story without it, and not the oblivious-narrator's story of how technology combined with human greed much more often than not equals massive environmental destruction. Aleister des chains 15:32 30 5 MMX
- Abs.Well, you know what. The last section was really, really good, but the first 5 sections were so boring, by the time I got there I didn't laugh. ~
     14:53, Jun 11, 2010
- Stain. While I really liked this, I found it more interesting that funny. Like HH says, the end was great, but could do with one or two more laughs at the beginning. --Black Flamingo 19:36, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the input. I made lots of additions and some changes, links, and it might be funnier now. Lots of the jokes build on each other as it reaches the last third of the page, which is why it may have "seemed" (only seemed, of course) in need of funny, which it may now have. You both deserve kudos for your assistance. Aleister 22:51 11 6 MMX
- Page moved to Why?:Reinvent the wheel, per Funnybony's suggestion, the perceptive bastard. Aleister 12:14 17 6 MMX
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
SelfNom and 
22:29, June 19, 2010 (UTC)
22:29, June 19, 2010 (UTC)