From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Dyscalculia
|
Score: 3 who can tell me what a verb is again?
|
| Nominated by:
|
Aleister
|
For: 5
|
 For. I was going to read noobie XDshempXD's (shemp!) page and make some suggestions. None to be made. Maybe you can find something to suggest. To me it's one of the tightest pages I've seen here. lol quite a bit too. Since I probably have this disease which isn't a disease, and can't make sense of most of math or "parts of speech (whatever that is)", it's a wonderful read. I'd tell you the author's name, but can't remember it and will be right back (there, put in above) Aleister 19:12 4-3-'12
 Comment. By the way, my name isn't shemp, it's just an absurd username. I was in a bit of a hurry when I thought of my username. - the dorky contralto    01:19, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- For.. Great idea, a feature!
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:19, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
- For. General Eisenhower (talk) 23:05, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
- For. OK, I voted for my own article. It's okay, right? -- the dorky contralto 01:17, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:53, 6 March 2012
|
Against: 2
|
- "Maths." Also, switches voices and tenses like a master puppeteer; is one-third quotes, one-third lists, and two-thirds confusing. Employs too many tactics of vagueness to avoid broadening the subject and going into detail. Not bad for a new guy, but is pretty flawed as is.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  22:31, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
 Against. It's too random. Way, way too random. There's a dialogue at the beginning that doesn't make sense until after you read the article, and even then, it doesn't make much sense. "Subject I don't understand = image of mysterious characters" is way too overdone. Also, it suddenly turns into an exasperated voice for unexplained reasons near the center. In short, needs a more consistent tone and a much stronger concept. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 20:21 Mar 12, 2012
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. If you didn't like it, that's okay. You didn't have to read it. Have a nice day. (By the way, "maths" is the British spelling. I figured it would be absurd on purpose, because that is the way I write. Once again, have a nice day.) -- the dorky contralto 01:17, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
For. I was going to read noobie 
Comment. By the way, my name isn't shemp, it's just an absurd username. I was in a bit of a hurry when I thought of my username. -
Against. It's too random. Way, way too random. There's a dialogue at the beginning that doesn't make sense until after you read the article, and even then, it doesn't make much sense. "Subject I don't understand = image of mysterious characters" is way too overdone. Also, it suddenly turns into an exasperated voice for unexplained reasons near the center. In short, needs a more consistent tone and a much stronger concept. 
Abstain. Along the lines of what TKF is saying. --
