Forum:Uncyc hates ed. ed hates uncyc. IF YOU DONT CARE POST HERE

Forums: Index > BHOP > Uncyc hates ed. ed hates uncyc. IF YOU DONT CARE POST HERE

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6031 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

I am seriously sick of this...

Who the hell really cares? The people who start this hatred are just childish.anger2headshot 21:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

IT WAS E.D.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 71.203.244.64 00:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC) EH?

And then Uncyc, being much better organized and inherently superior in every imaginable way having a longer attention span, dutifully beat the stuffing out of the issue until it was worked into a nice, homogeneous pulp that spreads well on toast. The issue, I think, had more humor value when ED threatened a legal action-thingy against Uncyc over the use of their "æ" logo and back when anybody gave a crap about which website had seniority. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 01:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I like both Encyclopediadramatica and Uncyc, both have their ups and downs, it's just that the love-hate between the two wikis is pretty funny. You remember the Uncyclopedia article on Wikipedia, saying that we're a satirical parody of them though we claim the reverse? That's similar to our relationship with ED: They claim we aren't funny, while we claim the reverse. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:00, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

What is this "ED"? 01:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

ED? Ed was some guy who came along. Good friend of mine. He's got his own wife and kids now, but not as cool as Joe. Joe's the man. We have beer bongs every friday. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

It's topics like this that keep a nonexistant "rivalry" alive. We have nothing to do with ED, so let's just drop it entirely, yes? —rc (t) 01:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I don't care do you? --Advertising Rights for this space is available.(Terms} Wildy I'm jumping on the bandwagon @You have something to say? 10:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

I DISAGREE TOTALLY ED IS THE WORST I HAD ED IT IS A LAME BUNCH OF POOPYGOA TSE THEY ARE A INTERNET FASCISTS I HATE THEM THEY ONLY HAVE 4000 ARTICLES COMPARED TO OR 23000 ARTICLES I HATE THEM THEY SUCK. nuff said.--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 21:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

BENSON DOESN'T CARE!

BENSON doesn't care, so I'm posting here! BENSON doesn't care at all! I REALLY don't care about ED! UNCYC FTW! Benson 23:07, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Benson! You're back! You know, for someone who doesn't much believe in you, I am disproportionally glad to see you again. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

The Chronicles of BENSON, Ch. IX, Sec. II: It was shown unto the universe in general, and especially the monkey-men of Uncyclopedia, that BENSON did not care. Spoke he thus; "BENSON doesn't care at all!" and it was understood that it was the Yucky Gross Website of Fake Humor that He cared not about. And yea, it was fortuitous that such knowledge was passed unto monkey-mankind, for they had grown bored, and yea, lazy and rather fat because they had not been reminded of the Awesomeness of BENSON for some time, and it is well known that the words of BENSON burn calories. The return was celebrated by Abnormal Yet False, who kneweth not that even an unbeliever such as she could share in the glorious knowledge of being Inferior To BENSON. In the name of the Holy BENSON, amen.

May I request an amendment of the chronicles? I believe when you translated this one from the original aramaic, you missed the circumflex on the root of "believer" that would indicate that Abnormal Yet False is an "unbeliever such as she". You're welcome. -- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Who the heck is Benson, anyway? (I require a serious and truthful answer, not a load of crap) anger2headshot 06:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Read Forum:BENSON IS HERE (yes, read the whole thing), and then imagine the next 8 months or so. Then read some more articles in the Category:Best Forum Topics Ever. That should give you a good idea of who BENSON is, and you will be able to appreciate your newfound knowledge for exactly eleven minutes before you go insane (because 11 is an annoying and pointless number). --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 08:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

BENSON IS BETTER THAN YOU. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 10:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

NO HE AIN'T! User:Trar/sig3

HURRAH FOR GREAT BENSON! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia is definitely better than the tripe-shit we call ED. ALL of their articles are just unfunny random content and shock images, why, last time I was there, the article on Beer had ANIME CHICKS in it, and the Uncyclopedia article had an image of The Beatles with poorly-drawn-on mustaches! They can't even spell right! We are truly better. User:Trar/sig3

The average Encyclopedia Dramatican

-- (but) Untrue  Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to post this pic everytime I see an ED-centric forum. It's a nice pic of my Pa'. *sniff*, I miss Pa'. Went out for smokes and never came back, he did. Plus, since headers don't appear to be length-limited, I can just ramble on about whatever comes to mind. Which is nice. The rambling, I mean...

ED; large and in charge, probably. I haven't been there in a while. Not since that picture of my butt exploded on the scene. Not literally. (Okay, literally).

--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:31, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Wait a minnit...

Anger2headshot, if you're sick of this quite overdone topic, why make another forum post about it? —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 13:33, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

OH SNAPZ! He's gotcha there. Plus, you can never have enough anti-ED topics. What the Tom Dooley? 22:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................

anger2headshot 07:31, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

BTW...

INTERSTITAL ADS SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

OMFG ED HAS THEM!!!!!!!!!!

anger2headshot 07:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

IDGAS!!!!!!!!!--Math Poet 09:51, 21 April 2007 (UTC)