Forum:ATTN: Col. swordman

Forums: Index > BHOP > ATTN: Col. swordman

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6233 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Your statements are in direct contradiction with the facts! --User:Nintendorulez 22:55, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

VFP. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:22, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

We now have the offical featured image for Benson Reskin Day.--The One and Only Czar Yah 23:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

What? Oh! I'm SO SORRY. I thought this was just one of those places where you can spam all your lousy illogical arguements as much as your friggin' heart desires. (Since when has logic become so important in this website anyway, especially to UGOTM?) Anyway, if you want to render your pure worship to Ben-whoever-that-name-is, there are three things you can do:

Occupy an abandoned church and set up your shrine there.
Get your butt off Uncyc and run your own wiki.
Be a sysop, ban everyone you don't like, turn Uncyc into whatever you've got in mind and enjoy the fringe benefit of burning Euroipods.

You know what? Since you have contributed SO MUCH to this wiki, I am honouring you with this sysop nomination. Please note that this is a 100% REAL DEAL, and once you are opped, the whole world is all yours.

You still lose. And quit whining that I left one single note on your talk page. It's what talk pages are for, dumbass. And you're the one spamming your hatred of BENSON in every goddamn topic here so I wouldn't be complaining if I were you. --User:Nintendorulez 13:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! You have just demostrated, in a very elegant way, what is considered a "filmsy arguement".

Did I mention "BENSON"? How did you know I was referring to your beloved page-vandalising retard and not Ben Franklin?
Why must it be true that I was inclusively murmuring about all the random trash here rather complaining about people payig tribute to BENSON?
Did I spread my "hatred of BENSON" in "every goddamn topic here"? Please produce evidence to support your claim.
What is the purpose of the "Forum:" namespace? Do you really have to needlessly go to my talk page and repeat the same friggin' things you have already got here? Go and look at Splaka's talk page and see why you should never do that.

Answer my questions, particularly the first and the second ones, before you ever again claim that BENSON's arguement is in any sense valid. By the way, since you, Nintendorulez, have shown lack of proper respect to user resources, you are no longer welcomed to my talk page.

-- The Colonel (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Since you like lists, I will put this in a list for you.
BENSON is now contained to this forum and has been for a long time. He only ventures out to tell people they are in his league. As proven here: http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Benson
Get over your God-damned talk page. Delete the comments if you don't like them. And if you are to lazy to do that I will delete them for you.
It was OBVIOUS you were talking about BENSON.
Get over it. If any of the admins cared, BENSON would be gone by now. But he is not. So your constant bitching is not going to get anything accomplished.
--Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 00:46, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Just as I explained few days ago in IRC, the difference between stupidly funny and just stupid is that the former involves intelligence, whereas the latter means nothing more than acting thoughtlessly. Why is paying tribute to Benson "just stupid"? Well, let me put it this way: Suppose that one day I broke into your house and took a dump on your fancy carpet. Then, instead of drive me away or call the police, you proceeded to entertain and bow down to me. What did you achieve except humiliating yourself in the lowest way possible? Likewise, what have you achieved by paying tribute to a retard like Benson, whether he has been "contained" or not? If I were an ED fan, I would certainly take the opportunity and write a good article on it. Do you see the picture here? Letting Benson walk away with all the undue praises is not just humiliation to those who "worshipped" him but also to Uncyc as a whole. Indeed, I am more than aware of the fact that some admins do not care about what BENSON is doing here at all, and that's why I am giving Benson a proper treatment my own way.
Again, you have totally missed the point, OsirisX. It's not what Nintendorulez wrote in my talk page that mattered, but how he treated user resources that did. Till now, I still haven't received one single apology or at least any reassurance from him that the same thing won't happen again. If you insist in telling me to "get over it", then let's hope one day some authority will run over your mates with a tank and then demand you to "get over it".
So, if it was OBVIOUS that I was talking about BENSON, then wasn't it OBVIOUS too that I was complaining about people payig tribute to BENSON rather than murmuring about all the random trash here?
Speaking of "constant bitching", where is your god now? If that retard is really so worthy of your worshipping, then why not let him come forward and defend himself in his own behalf? Unfortunately, it seems to me that you guys have been used up already and now he is in a pub somewhere laughing at your stupidity with his mates (if he indeed has any).

-- The Colonel (talk) 14:08, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

If BENSON doesn't come back I wouldn't really care.
I give up with this. You can think you have 'won' or whatever, I really don't care anymore.
--Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Is it wrong that I'm amused by this page? It kind of feels like laughing at the Special Olympics. Please, allow me to refresh your memories of something:

It's only the internet.

-- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

OR IS IT?@!>!?!?!!@@!#

--Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC) Would you kindly explain what's wrong with leaving a comment on your talk page? And speaking of which, you still didn't reply to said topic I keep telling you to read. --User:Nintendorulez 14:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

And that's precisely why you don't understand the importance of not spamming things everywhere. I have given you my arguements loud and clear, and what is really the point of writing exactly the same stuff there just for the sake of having my words on the page anyway? -- Colonel Swordman, the one and the only devil of Uncyc, 15:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Forum:Col. Swordman! Let's end this now! Colonel, stop pretending you haven't read this yet.

User for administrator

Nintendorulez

Score: definately plus, not minus 9 billion

Nom - because I feel like it. -- The Colonel (talk) 09:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Sure, he seems like a good guy. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 01:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Conditional For As long as he doesn't touch Euroipods in any way.--69.105.136.194 15:19, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, consensus seems to reflect keeping it, so as much as I hate it, I wouldn't touch it until the majority agrees... --User:Nintendorulez 14:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

For. Probably the best sense of humor here. Crazyswordsman 01:36, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Against. Too much of a dumbass, can't write articles worth crap. --User:Nintendorulez 14:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

FOR. BENSON VOTES FOR, THEREFORE I SHALL TOO. --User:Nintendorulez 13:34, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Neutral I just come to these meetings for the food. --The Zombiebaron 13:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Wii. It's a good idea, I say work on it when you're opped.--Wit (tawk) 03:57, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Over my mutilated, decaying, defiled corpse. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 09:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Unconditional For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 20:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
For WHOOPDY DEE! Jaybenad 22:42, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Conditional For. The removal of Euroipod 07:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
FOR BENSON LIKES THIS PLAN OF ACTION. Benson 20:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)