User talk:Quidpronihilo

Just drop some lines to me here.

FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK

The picture you've included for Pablo is funny

Hello there. I like your start on the Pablo Neruda article, I included a mention of him in my article for Jack Kerouac check it out if you get a chance, and let me know if you want any help/advice on Pablo.--Claudius Prime 14:21, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

Okay cool, let's do something funny with Mr. Neruda. I am not from Chile, I am American, but have always been a big fan of Pablo, and he deserves a long amusing article. I'm going to put something together over the next couple days, so look for it, and help me edit- change it up. Thanks dude.--Claudius Prime 14:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Pablo Neruda

I left you some comments at User_talk:Dawg. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 13:09, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

On Redirecting

For the love of all things holy, PLEASE do not make unecessary or multiple redirects. Plus, It helps to make your userpage readable, I made edits appropriately. Revert them if you wish, but please: moderation.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:01, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Words for you

In case you didn't see, I replied to you on my talk page. Please take the opportunity to read my statement as to prevent potential future conflicts.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 06:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

On Chile

Please stop removing the template at the top. As much as you don't think that the template isn't right, someone else does. Be aware that while we don't have a 3RR policy, we do advise that you don't be a dick. Besides, don't take those templates seriously. We try not to do that here so much. I happen to agree with the template, but please, it's there for shits/giggles.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 15:53, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Please Don't Blank User Pages

I've given you a complimentary vacation....feel free to come and discuss it on the sites IRC channel. Usually the way to resolve issues over deleted articles is to chat to the "Deleting Officer" or another Admin, not to blank their user page or rant at them. I appreciate that you, like all of us, become emotionally attached to our creations, which is why in many cases, after discussion, borderline work is considered redeemible. I personally would prefer to see people who are passionately wanting to improve the quality of the articles here, than a lot of the random crap that gets posted here. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Sin City

YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE REAL FUCKIN' MORON. BECAUSE OF YOU DELETING MY SIN CITY PAGE, EVEN IF I PUT AN AD I'D COMPLETE IT LATER, YOU DELETED IT. FUCK YOU, IT'S BECAUSE PEOPLE LIKE YOU, THAT TAKE THE RULES HERE SO SERIOUSLY, LIKE A PIG FASCIST, INSTEAD OF TRYIN' TO CONTACT THAT PERSON AND ASK IF HE HAS NEW MATERIAL FOR THE PAGE, YOU FOLLOW THE RULES. FUCK YOU, SERIOUSLY. --Quidpronihilo

The rules say "If this page is unedited for 7 days it may be huffed." The construction template had expired. I read your article, and determined it to be worthless.

I suggest you refresh yourself with the rules before you subject anyone else to your misguided hyberbole.

A creative writing class wouldn't hurt, either.

~ T. (talk) 23:46, 2 March 2006 (UTC)