User talk:Mosquitopsu
Opinionate[edit source]
I know that you're entitle to your opinion of everything, but just because you made one halfway decent image in your five months here doesn't make you God on high. I cannot find a single affirmitve vote from you on VFP. It is one thing to shoot down crap, quite another to shoot down everything. What you are doing is not positively contributing, but instead subverting the intended purpose of VFP. Your incessant "no"s against every picture ever created are detrimental to the continued function of VFP. --His Royal Majesty, Simulacrum Caputosis the Great14:20, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
- First of all, I want you to note that my image is the third highest ranked image in Uncyclopedia according to Previously Featured Pictures, which according to the laws of Uncyclopedia makes me a living god. I do not shoot down everything on VPF, but I feel that a large bulk of it (90% or more) is not worth even commenting on. This is the reason that VFP ws shutdown for a few days, meaning I am not the only one with this feeling. I see that you are upset because your tampon image is currently being voted on and I just pissed all over the voting by stamping no on it. I apologize. Your image is not cannon fodder as the other images nominated that day, but I do feel that it is not a FP quality either. My plain no was part of my stampede voting down all the images the other day. I will try to be more careful when I shoot down images in the future. --Mosquitopsu 15:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Also, Previously Featured Pictures will reveal many affirmative votes of mine. --Mosquitopsu 15:33, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Delete em[edit source]
Admins can't check every talk page for "delete" votes. If you think a page should be huffed, you can post it to VFD, and if it's really bad, QVFD. Good day, sir. --—rc (t) 18:18, 22 Oct 2005 (UTC)
Moves[edit source]
Be careful with moves. You've created a double redirect in here (be sure to clean up after them). --Splaka 01:05, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
- Thanks. I probably wouldn't have noticed. I have cleaned up all the double links. Thanks again! --Mosquitopsu 01:24, 29 Oct 2005 (UTC)
VFH[edit source]
Thanks for voting on VFH, especially for my Founding Fathers. However, you forgot to sign this vote. Technically I can't count it, so you may want to, you know, mosey on over and give it your John Hancock. Can you tell how desperate I am to get a featured article? ;) --—rc (t) 02:14, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, that article is great! I hope to see it on the main page sometime soon. I did a lot of voting on pages today (mostly voting against) so I probably missed a few signatures. Thanks. I am fixing the problem now. (Won't forget it this time --->) --Mosquitopsu 03:53, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Grazie[edit source]
Thanks for your comment! You're my new favorite person. I've been here for almost eight months already so I've had a lot of time to waste, especially with photoshopping. Though with my adminly duties, my "real" contributions have been kind of sporadic lately. Thanks again! --—rc (t) 21:17, 2 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Five Minutes[edit source]
Because of extreme acts of kindness and in spite of a flashy signature, the five minute debt that is owed by Some user will be fulfulled by me. If you evr need a paragraph profread or parhaps your speling checked, I'm guy for job. --Imrealized 08:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
- Be ready, for I shall call upon your services when
your countryI needsit. --Mosquitopsu 15:28, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Negative[edit source]
Why are you so negative? You have voted against on nearly all of the VFP entries. True, some of them were really bad, but the problem you mentioned with mine was way less noticeable that most of the other problems. Plus, I fixed it, and now there is really no problem with it. Maybe you should give people a little more credit. -- 23:31, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
- Featured images should be the best of the best of the best of Uncyclopedia. This requires that images be beaten to death with critisism if they have even the slightest flaw. This is the same way I treat my Oopma Loopma slaves to keep them disciplined. I am not usually so crual, but VFP is a place that has way too much garbage coming in that being a meanie head is needed. --Mosquitopsu 13:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- What you say is true, but a lot of the stuff you voted against for is actually pretty good. At any rate, your services are needed, because VFP is quickly filling up with crap again. -- 18:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Double redirects[edit source]
When making a redirect, please make sure it is set to the end-page and not another redirect. Redirects stop at the fisrt page it encounters, you see.
But in any case, thanks for keeping Uncyclopedia clean and easy (despite the silly mistakes).--~ sin($) tan(€) 00:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. I will be more careful in the future. --Mosquitopsu 20:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)