User:Simsilikesims/This article's title sucks 10
The title of this article sucks. First of all, its unoriginal. Second of all, who puts numbers in the title of an article that's supposed to be funny? I don't know of any human being who puts random numbers in their titles to make their articles funnier, that's for sure. Third of all, there is no redeeming content in this article that might give the reader a pleasant surprise when hoping for something funny. So you can stop reading now, but if you keep reading, don't say I didn't warn you.
Unoriginal[edit | edit source]
Articles about articles are so overdone around here. Puh-leeze, yet another article about itself? That's vanity for starters, and we have policies about vanity. And please, no more articles with history sections in them. History just isn't funny: When was the last time you heard someone laughing in history class? I'm gonna scream if I see another article that relies on jokes about Oscar Wilde, Chuck Norris, Grues or Nazis, or another attempted parody on an anime show. Those are SO unoriginal. The article title could be so much more original like.....ummm.....nevermind. No, I don't mean Nevermind - that's copyrighted by Nirvana. What was my point again? Oh yeah, be Original. If its not original, its probably not funny, or else its probably copyrighted. And we really don't need some bigwig's lawyers on our case.
Numbers in the Title[edit | edit source]
Who puts random numbers in the titles of their articles? Certainly not any human being I know of. "This article's title sucks 10"....ten of what? On the other hand, I don't think I want to know. Spambots use random numbers in their articles, and its just like putting a "kick me" sign on the article, except in this case its more like a QVFD me sign. Articles with numbers in the title should be shot on sight unless they actually have something to do with said number. Like 69 for example. Throwing random numbers into the article title is a fast track to getting it deleted. Does anyone actually think random numbers are funny? Okay, maybe if you are a mathematician, but they have to be done right. People who put numbers in the title of their article should be forced to go back and read HTBFANJS as well as UN:FAIL.
No Redeeming Value[edit | edit source]
This article isn't funny enough to make up for its lame title. Sometimes the stupidity of a lame title can be made up for in outstanding content. But this article has insufficient content to redeem its poor excuse for a title. Some might call it a rant, and they would be right. But at least it isn't a list. If it was a list, it would make the VFD list in no time. But still, it doesn't have enough penis jokes in it or sexual innuendo in it to be worthy of mainspace. No article without at least one penis (or phallic symbol) joke or some form of sexual innuendo is worthy of mainspace. So if you were expecting sexual humor, sorry but this essay is nonsexual in nature. It has no redeeming value at all. Its like that bridge I built in Bridge Simulator that came crashing down under its own weight because I couldn't afford to reinforce the darn thing enough. See, I told you so, but you just had to keep reading, you optimist you.