Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:It's worth learning Bahasa Indonesia (2nd Opinion)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Why?:It's worth learning Bahasa Indonesia[edit source]
I ask for the second Opinion. It's already got a good review which can be seen here. It got nice score and reviewer didn't ask for many changes but I corrected what he asked for and I put it here again.
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 21:56, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose I should review something before I forget how. I know nothing about Bahasa Indonesia, but if I did I wouldn't need to learn it, would I? Look for a review within 24 hours. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 23:47, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
- I chastised someone else for delaying their reviews, and now I'm doing it, and for that I'm very sorry. I've had a lot of messages on various pages here to answer, am getting IC going, etc. I've logged on three times thinking, "I'll do the review now," but then found I had a lot of questions to answer, updates to do, etc. I started a review, but haven't finished it. If someone else wants to do it, that's fine with me. If no one takes it before Monday, 8 February, I'll do it as I got Royal Hobart Regatta off--I really should reserve Sunday for getting IC going. Again, I'm very sorry about the delay. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 19:12, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
- I'll have this article reviewed quicker than you can say "Apa kabar." King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 23:13, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Humour: | 4 | There were some parts I found funny, as I talked about above. Some others I might have found funny if it was reworded. |
Concept: | 7 | The concept seemed to be, well, Why?:It's worth learning Bahasa Indonesia. It clearly fits the title, which is good. And the article almost alwasy stays on track, which is also good. But the concept itself is rather limited. Still, with more development in the writing, I think it can work just fine. |
Prose and formatting: | 4 | I add Humour comments in with P & F so I don't repeat myself unnecessarily, but do score them separately.
Your score isn't higher primarily because of the non-standard English usage, which I talk about below. Your intro
Reason one
Reason two
Reason three
Reason four
Reason five
Reason six
Reason seven
Reason eight
'Reason nine
Summary
|
Images: | 7 | I thought the images were OK, but really, how many great images are there for an article about a language? The caption on the first image could use some rewording. On the second, Demo_suharto.jpg, I was guessing that was some kind of protest, but the caption didn't tell me that. I think it would be better if it did. I thought the Poor Orangutannie image was fine, but don't get why it's spelled Orangutannie here and Orangutan in the article. I actually rather liked the Julius Malema caption, but only because I already read that article (and as I said above to me the J.M. section didn't work). Most of your readers will likely know nothing about this guy, and won't get the joke. I think the Obama image is fine. |
Miscellaneous: | 5.5 | Average of above. |
Final Score: | 27.5 | Again, one of the main problems I found was the use of English. I'd strongly recommend getting someone who's a talented writer and very proficient with English to work with you on this. Good luck with your article! |
Reviewer: | King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court) 23:13, February 8, 2010 (UTC) |