UnScripts talk:Grass in the Mist II

Just 'cause I'm so nice, I'm gonna make you a nice picture for this page (the old image with a 2 on it). :D - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:19, Dec 8

Heey, awesome! And that sounds like it'll be quite an artistic effort as well...quite emotionally draining...I'll mainspace it for now, and you can add the image whenever it's made. Thanks! :) --THE 21:24, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Any preferences for the color? I was thinking a hot pink, and I think a Roman Numeral "II" looks classy, how about you? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:30, Dec 8

Yeah, you can be the judge of color and font. A roman numeral II sounds good though, as a matter of fact, I think I might have to rename the article "Grass in the Mist II" at some point... --THE 21:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

You can always redirect it. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:36, Dec 8

Good idea. Done. Now that old conversation will look totally insane, but whatever. Now let's just hope I don't decide to switch it to "Grass in the Mist Two" or I'll be moving this page around all day.... --THE 21:43, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

I'm likin' the pic! :) --THE 21:44, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Cool, glad to be of service. :D MS Paint 4 Life! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:47, Dec 8

From Pee Review

Well, I never thought I'd write a sequel to Grass in the Mist, but then this idea came along and I thought "What the hell. I'll go for it." As the author, I can't judge it very well. The only thing I know for sure is that it's longer and more preposterous. Other than that, I've no idea. I'd really appreciate an in-depth review. What are the weakest points? Should I shorten it? How does it compare to the first one? Is it...any good? --THE 00:30, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Grass in the Mist II is being reviewed by CajekHi! Your Source for Fine Scented Pee And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him

Grass in the mist? Uh oh, I have some extra reading to do...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 8 / 16:20)

Let me just say: How did the original hilarious article pass me by??? ...holy crap that's funny. Okay, begin review!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 8 / 18:12)

Humour:	8.8	avg of each section Scene One [9] Your writing style is pretty similar to mine, I think. We're both kinda "out there" if you know what I mean. I didn't give you a 10 because this isn't exactly an addition to GitM, it could be a sequel to any documentary, really. Scene Two [9] Yes, again though it could be a sequel to anything really. Scene Three [10] Perfect. Scene Four [8] Still lots of lols, but... are you sniffing glue? I ask because, uh... (too random to be perfect) Scene Five [8] Are you snorting ajax? Zippy's cooler than Spiffy, but, still something is lost in the translation from THE to human. Scene Six [9] Are you licking waterbuffalo? By the way, this isn't Africa, is it? Scene Seven [8] uuuuuuhhhhhhhhhh... I thought I was good at reviewing but I don't know what to say Scene Eight [9] Nice ending. Obviously that moron didn't have any possessions!
Concept:	8	A winner, but it is still a sequel. You are a very good writer.
Prose and formatting:	9	Good formatting.
Images:	0	*OOF!* duh, no pictures!
Miscellaneous:	6.5	avg
Final Score:	32.3	Throw it on mainspace, it's ready. That was fun to read, although it was extremely long. It would be okay to get rid of one of those scenes. I think the weakest scene was maybe the fourth one... I'm not sure what else to say! Go ahead and bother me if you want a rereview
Reviewer:	Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 8 / 21:04)