From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theocracy is formed from two Greek terms. Theo-, meaning God and cracy, meaning Rule. It is used to describe a government in which God directly rules. Because there don't seem to be many prophets around nowadays to communicate God's will, it is normally controlled by the average religious person (see Anarchy)This term is synonymous with Theoarchy, God is the Leader, and Anarchy, God Rules. Anarchy is slightly different however, because in this type of theocracy God has an ineffective or nonexistent penal system. Science usually is to blame for this type of government as His people are no longer fearful their punishments; earthquakes, hurricanes, tsunamis, strokes, heart attacks, etc. This is the preferred government style of the Republican Party in the USA.

History of Theocracy[edit | edit source]

The term Theocracy was coined by Josephus Flavius in the second century AD. Josephus saw that the traditional way of governing wasn’t working and came up with a new idea. The concept of proclaiming oneself a god or a son of god was decreasing in effectiveness because of the inherent incongruities between the many gods or sons of gods. The common people quickly became confused and disillusioned in these leaders and were only kept in order by fear. In order to liberate the people from the tacit mendaciousness of different governments, the movement toward one God became popular and necessary. Under the One God Theocracy a leader could specifically talk to the Creator and govern his people accordingly. unfortunately, this also caused great debates between different governments on defining God.

The Formation of Theocracy[edit | edit source]

Typically when a government is theocratic, God will allow one person to govern in His name. Presumably this is to avoid Anarchy. See Iran. In rare occasions, God will grant His power to many people and these people will vote for a leader who speaks for God. This is known as a theocratic democracy or just democracy. In extremely rare cases, a Constitutional Monarchy forms where God gives rule to the people. The people then vote to give their rule to other people. These other people will then vote for a single ruler who in turn speaks to a different government’s ruler that talks for him or her through God. This inefficient form of theocracy is neither effective nor does it last very long even if the final votes are for God to rule.

Theocracy by any other name would smell as sweet[edit | edit source]

Since the debates over defining God have increased in number and severity, most people/governments shy away from the term theocracy but instead coin terms that are more politically correct. These governments seek to advertise themselves as something else. Some choose to soften theocracy with words like “republic” or “democracy” while others choose to drop the term completely making up alternative terms to go with the aforementioned softening words.

  • Republic – A phenomenal term, it’s all about the people. Ex. Argentina, Bolivia, Columbia, France, Lebanon, Nicaragua, Rwanda, South Africa, Sweden, Zambia and many others.
  • Islamic Republic – the use of “Islamic” is bold in that it specifies the Islamic God rules but is offset by the word Republic. Ex. Afghanistan, Pakistan, Canuckistan.
  • Federal Republic – A nation of the people. A nice politically correct term. Ex. Germany and India
  • Mormocratic Theocracy - Mormocracies are headed by an authoritarian, overzealous autocrat, usually named Gordon B. Hinkley or some other old guy (can never be a woman) who will take over when the other old guy dies. Ex. Utah.
  • Theocratic Republic – More politically correct than Islamic Republic but essentially the same thing just less ballsy. Ex. Iran.
  • Parliamentary Democracy – This is a theocracy ruled by owls. Ex. Bangladesh, Canada, Israel, Turkey.
  • What-America-Should-Be - Sarah Palin's policies on issues such as abortion, sex where you don't get pregnant, gay marriage, mandatory religious instruction on public schools (creationism, prayer) and just about anything else.
  • Gaggle Democracy – This is a theocracy ruled by geese. Ex. Canada.
  • Constitutional Democracy or Republic – Literally, Gods words in legal form. Not as effective of government as a constitutional monarchy though. Ex. Guatemala, Panama.
  • Hippocracy – Ruled by hippopotami. Ex. Oprah
  • Monarchy – The most oppressive theocracy. Ex. Canada, Saudi Arabia.
  • Constitutional Monarchy – The most popular form of theocracy. Ex. Denmark, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Thailand, United Kingdom.
  • Constitution-based federal republic monarchy with strong parliamentary democratic traditions, democracy – Also known as neo-conservative hypocracy. This is usually the last stage of true theocracy. Ex. United States of America, Australia(?)

Evolution of Theocracy[edit | edit source]

Theocracy has many non-linear stages but all theocracies end up in one of two categories, Communism or Hypocrisy. Communists are atheist and therefore are never considered theocratic. On the other hand, Hypocratics are often confused as being theocratic but are generally considered atheist. They commonly are shoved into a sub group of theocracy, hence the term hypo- meaning below.

List of theocractic societies[edit | edit source]

  • Confederacy of God-Created states
    • Heaven (January 1, 4001 BCE to present)
    • Hell (January 1, 4001 BCE to present)
    • Purgatory (January 1, 4001 BCE to present)
    • Limbo (January 1, 4001 BCE to November 30, 2005 CE)
  • Vatican City (February 11, 1929 CE to present)

What do Christians think of theocracy[edit | edit source]

I am a democrat because I believe that no man or group of men is good enough to be trusted with uncontrolled power over others. And the higher the pretensions of such power, the more dangerous I think it both to rulers and to the subjects. Hence Theocracy is the worst of all governments. If we must have a tyrant a robber baron is far better than an inquisitor. The baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity at some point may be sated; and since he dimly knows he is doing wrong he may possibly repent. But the inquisitor who mistakes his own cruelty and lust of power and fear for the voice of Heaven will torment us infinitely more because he torments us with the approval of his own conscience and his better impulses appear to him as temptations.

And since Theocracy is the worst, the nearer any government approaches to Theocracy the worse it will be. A metaphysic held by the rulers with the force of a religion, is a bad sign. It forbids them, like the inquisitor, to admit any grain of truth or good in their opponents, it abrogates the ordinary rules of morality, and it gives a seemingly high, super-personal sanction to all the very ordinary human passions by which, like other men, the rulers will frequently be actuated. In a word, it forbids wholesome doubt. A political programme can never in reality be more than probably right. We never know all the facts about the present and we can only guess the future. To attach to a party programme — whose highest claim is to reasonable prudence — the sort of assent which we should reserve for demonstrable theorems, is a kind of intoxication.

(C.S. Lewis, British writer)