Template talk:NoWikipedia

Bad edit summary

Just a minor clarification: The Wikipedia link in my last edit summary should really go to WP:BEANS, since that applies more directly to the situation at hand than WP:DENY does. Pentium5dot1 06:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Daily Mail

I just noticed this template with a red link. The Daily Mail page has been huffed, so it needs to be removed from this template. Leverage (talk) 16:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Well the basic joke is "Daily Mail=stupid, not really experts", so I guess any perjorative link could be put in its place, like experts. --Leverage (talk) 11:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Ya I'd do it but obviously I'm not going to. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 20:40, 24 Feb 2014Uncyclopedia is a community site that anyone can contribute to. Discover, share and add your knowledge! UncyclopediaUncyclopediaIllogicopediai:fr:LogimalpediePaudurapedyjaFrithchiclipeidUncapaediaAbsurdopediaScotypedia

I am confused. Are you saying the red link is good? Leverage (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm saying I'm not an admin. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:00, 24 Feb 2014Uncyclopedia is a community site that anyone can contribute to. Discover, share and add your knowledge! UncyclopediaUncyclopediaIllogicopediai:fr:LogimalpediePaudurapedyjaFrithchiclipeidUncapaediaAbsurdopediaScotypedia

If anyone should be made an admin by acclamation, it's you. Aleister 1:47 25-2-14

I forgot you weren't an admin. Thanks to RAHB for doing the honours. Leverage (talk) 11:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)