Template talk:Bat Fuck Insane
No, really. Take a look at this. I mean, can you really justify putting a ((stub)) or ((crack)) template on that? I couldn't. Thus the ((Bat Fuck Insane)) template. Feel free to fix it up - this was just a diversion while I tried not to do real work. And the actual Bat_Fuck_Insane page needs real work. So, am I fired, or does this have promise?
--Famine 20:08, 12 Apr 2005 (EDT)
Wow, crazy colors. Too bad its not used. I think ill look for some bat fucking insane pages to add it too. --Paulgb Talk 15:20, 18 Apr 2005 (EDT)
I added the template to Sanity. It needed it. ;> --AshyRaccoon 10:22, 1 May 2005 (EDT)
Good call. I removed the ((stub)) on Sanity since this template also has an edit link in it. And it looked cluttered with both. --Famine 11:08, 1 May 2005 (EDT)
Thanks for the addition of the graphic, Evice, but I wonder if that's the best option. I mean, the bird, while exceptionally well done, isn't insane. Humm...what else do we have for images.... --Famine 18:26, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
- I don't think the robot looks insane. :) I'm looking through images, listing some I consider insane. I've listed them regardless of author, license, where they've been used, size, etc. I don't know how to link without actually displaying the image (wasting bandwidth :) ), so.. Clown1.jpg Allo.jpg Image:Adamant2.jpg Image:Popeeyebeams.jpg Image:Boris_johnson.jpeg Image:Typing_monkey.jpg Image:Popeye.jpg Image:Hillarystache.jpg Image:Traitorchris.jpg
- --AshyRaccoon 20:21, 2 May 2005 (EDT)
Fear not - I hacked them into "real" links, so we can clickie-clickie. Of those above, I feel the top 2 are: Image:Adamant2.jpg and Image:Popeeyebeams.jpg. I'd love to see either of those two in the image spot. Both are fairly insane. @ Evice - thanks for the resizing. It really needed it. --Famine 17:03, 3 May 2005 (EDT)
- I'm switching to the popeeyebeams for the time being - they're far better than the robot. Yell if you hate it. --Famine 20:06, 5 May 2005 (EDT)
What happened?[edit source]
She's not working, cap'n! All I'm seeing is a long list of possible "<options>".... I hate to think that's the joke? --Lenoxus 23:01, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
- Looks fine here. The only recent edit to anything random ({{verb}}) on this page seems to be kosher. --Splaka 04:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- Seems to be all right now to me, too. --Lenoxus 19:07, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
The templates Violation, Digit, Wikipedian, Bat Fuck Insane, and Ape Shit Crazy, have all gone Ape Shit Crazy. Here they are:
It is a violation of federal, state, and/or international law to view this article. Thus, YOU MAY NOT VIEW THIS ARTICLE. Violators will be punished with instant decapitation and a $20,000 fine. |
8888
For those obsessed with the so-called experts, Bat Fuck Insane also has a userpage on the English Wikipedia. |
This lumber is a complete, irredeemable blah. The submitter is Bat Fuck Insane, recollects at the heel, and is an unfunny dolt. If you lather to quantify this you will most distastefully duel yourself. Or the submitter will calcify your idiot!!!!!! |
This impetus is, rather unfortunately, completely and utterly Ape-Shit Crazy. Its opaqueness and congruentness do nothing to aid this. The monoclonal antibody is Ape-Shit Crazy, and reigns champion at the zoo. If you attempt to stink this, you will (in a most unimpressed manner) become Ape-Shit Crazy yourself. Or else the editors at Uncyclopedia will eat your tail!!!!!! |
Dagoth Ur, Mad God 09:52, 8 May 2008 (UTC)