Talk:Polygamy

Okay I Like Jolteon (talk) 19:25, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

About this article

Should it get QVFD'd, or...?

For some reason it hasn't been deleted by the admins since its inception (which was last year), despite being incredibly random, having been created by an IP that I'm pretty sure was either drunk or high, and pretty much breaking Don't be stupid. It's existence is basically a miracle.

Quite personally, I don't mind it being not deleted, as it seems kind of postmodern art to me. But the fact the admins didn't delete it nor even place an ICU when it first was created is pretty strange to me. Also there probably is a way better article that could be done with the concept of "polygamy" that this current article is preventing from existing. Which is why I'm making this question now; a question that should probably been done before: should this be deleted? (Or if not deleted, at least moved to Polygamy/nonsense version, so that it can be kept as an artpiece, but allow for a better article to grow) DaniPine3 (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Pretty funny you should mention that, because i did put an ICU on this when it was created. I don't know when (or why), but it was removed by someone else at some point apparently. You can nominate it for VFD if you want, but it's definitely too old (and not terrible enough) to go on QVFD. 20:04, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

It was removed by the same IP that started it. Something tells me they might not have even known what that was for. DaniPine3 (talk) 20:08, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

tbf, so far no one seems to be interested to make an (actual) article on polygamy, so maybe we could let this be kept as a placeholder. It's true that its nonsense makes it kinda funny; mabve even a work of art, as I said before.DaniPine3 (talk) 20:11, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

The joke is that they had a stroke, not the funniest but ok ݬલטαฬ םɐۼ - ᚦ¡ទᑕʋᛢᛇ - ɪ øటñ ᑌᑎᑦᛉ๔1០ᖀξᗟᛧą - but ɳ̩ɵɞ_°₫￥ ເἀᚱΞᛇ 23:53, 23 September 2024 (UTC)