Talk:M&M's
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
4/9/2021 Pee Review[edit source]
| Humour: | 4 | It's alright. Too many facts, though, and the funnies are ruined by the concept. See below. |
| Concept: | 3 | M&Ms can be a worth-while concept, however it is turned into a total bummerfest by all the mentions of modern United States politics, which really have nothing to do with M&Ms. |
| Prose and formatting: | 5.5 | The article looks fine, however it is read in the style of First Person, which does not work well for this article. Try to remove any mentions of "I", or less Uncyclopediac forms of talking, such as the beginning of the "History" subsection. |
| Images: | 4 | There sure are images. They're not funny, though. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | Oh Sweet Christ, it's not a Hurricane article. However, I am going to annhilate you if you ever put another link to a legit shop in an article. |
| Final Score: | 25.5 | Decent Article. Needs work, though. Cheers |
| Reviewer: | WohMi, the Dueling King (talk) 04:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC) | |
For viewing, and because this was multiple people helping, so they know what to do. Signed, -Gale5050 aka Andrew5 let's talk! See me on WP! Do not click before August 21:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)