Talk:Incest

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Incest. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

From Pee Review

This article was on the VFD list about a week or so ago and has since left the list. God knows why (I don't) I got involved with it, other than to say that it reminded me of the Red Headed Bastard Step Child that shows up at my husbands family reunions. Any how, I have added text, images, etc. and now I submit it to Pee Review for more suggestions on improving it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	8	Incest is hilarious, and this article makes good light of that.
Concept:	7	On the same token, incest isn't that challenging to make funny.
Prose and formatting:	5	Some of the sections are a bit short (could use some more elaboration). That, and red links = BAD.
Images:	6	About half of the images (2) actually have comedic value and seem actually seem relevant.
Miscellaneous:	2	This article seems like some sort of subtle bashing campaign. Including Laura & George Bush and Dick Cheney in an article about incest seems like desperation from the author to pull funnies out of his/her ass. That, and they really don't add comedic value on my standpoint.
Final Score:	28	Not a bad article. Just needs to be tuned up a bit.
Reviewer:	--EMC [TALK] 22:46, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

no VFD for sure.--199.193.10.202 21:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)