Talk:Fuck ChiefjusticeDS
That was like a month ago when I started it -- maniac mcpee 04:35, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- That long? Damn, I need to hurry up and finish it... ~
*shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 05:31 (UTC)
- Hey. Guess who created this article by all means. I made a true edit on that, and you deleted it. If it wasn't for me, you wouldn't have this article here. --
Go Crazy 
Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 15:24, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- And to be consistent, citing you would also require citing everyone else, and as most of them are recorded as IPs, that would just look trashy. You are clearly in the page history, however, and stuff... ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101126 - 16:20 (UTC)
- And to be consistent, citing you would also require citing everyone else, and as most of them are recorded as IPs, that would just look trashy. You are clearly in the page history, however, and stuff... ~
- Hey. Guess who created this article by all means. I made a true edit on that, and you deleted it. If it wasn't for me, you wouldn't have this article here. --
Ah, to think it was but my second Pee Review. My, oh my, how they grow up so fast! ;-)--Scofield 14:05, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
YES I DID IT, AN ARTICLE I CREATED IS FEATURED!!!! :) --MANIAC MCPEE 21:28, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Congrats!! DJ Mixerr 23:08, November 30, 2010 (UTC) User:DJ Mixerr/sig
I hope it gets voted top article of 2010, that'd be sweeeeeeeet! -- 
Go Crazy 
Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 19:55, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
6th best article of 2010, and it was my creation. How's that? -- Go Crazy Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 05:07, February 7, 2011 (UTC)
Younch[edit source]
How did I miss this article? Oh, right, I've been sick. Shit. My life blows. 
Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 20:59, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
- I was the one that created "Fuck ChiefjusticeDS". Lyrithya just made it better. To see the original version go here. -- Go Crazy Awards ~ Contribs ~ Gallery ~ Piglet 21:11, February 18, 2011 (UTC)
What's with the random images?[edit source]
Are those supposed to be like that? I mean, they cover parts of the text! Should I be fixing it or not? --Mimo&maxus 21:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yep, don't touch da images. OR ELSE. I WILL EAT YOUR ROUTER. -- 21:09, 19 September 2013 (UTC) :>
- I think the answer is actually 'no'. They are not supposed to be like that. I think - but I'm not 100% sure - that what's supposed to happen is that there's a blue word in the text and you mouse over and the image appears. Looking at the code that's what I think it ought to do (you'll see 'sigexpand' and 'sighidden' tags). – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, that's how they are supposed to be! I remember when I first read the article and the images appeared only when there was a cursor on the blue text. --Mimo&maxus 13:50, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- I can't understand why but, even if I replace parts of the new text with the old one, the one used when the images were working smoothly, the page still looks like shit! There doesn't seem to be any solution to this. --Mimo&maxus 14:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think the answer is actually 'no'. They are not supposed to be like that. I think - but I'm not 100% sure - that what's supposed to happen is that there's a blue word in the text and you mouse over and the image appears. Looking at the code that's what I think it ought to do (you'll see 'sigexpand' and 'sighidden' tags). – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 22:05, 19 September 2013 (UTC)