Talk:Flamethrower
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
this article is not funny at all. needs to be redone.
- Redone :)--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 16:07, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
Hiya, I put this article as a contestant in the PLS for best images, even though it was a rewrite. I worked hard on this article to make as good as possible and I'd like to nominate it for a feature. Can you rate it and tell me if Flamethrower is good and where I can improve?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Humour: | 6.5 | Good introduction, but the first two or three headings are a bit thin on jokes. |
Concept: | 7 | Got to be good comic potential in a method of causing painful death. I like the flamewar references too. |
Prose and formatting: | 7 | Nice simple structure, nothing wrong with that |
Images: | 8 | All pretty good, can see why it was nominated for best images. |
Miscellaneous: | 7.125368912 | marshmallows |
Final Score: | 35.625368912 | A few more jokes in the early paragraphs would be good. Why not change "flame shield" to "firewall" to continue the internet reference. Quite good overall but not yet ready for VFH |
Reviewer: | --Kelpan 16:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC) |