Talk:Crash test dummy

As it stands the article is more 'Crash Test Retards' than 'Crash Test Dummy'. I don't know about the China bit either or the joke about Bangladesh in the picture caption. I think it would be better to condense the alternatives (real people/retards/cadavers) and concentrate more the 'Dummy'. Like who are they ? That could make it a bit more surreal ? I know that probably means a different story from the one you have here but as it stands, I don't think this is going to make VFH. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:18, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Hmm... I asked for a mid-rewrite pee review, and got a random comment about how it won't make VFH on the article's talk page? VFH isn't the sole goal for me when writing articles, I like tidying up some of the junk, too. Hmm... Check out the version before I started editing, and you might start seeing some positive improvement in stead of bashing my attempts to remove the word "retard" from the article and working on adding some intellectual humour to the thing. I'm not exactly your average newbie user anymore... Thank you. -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 15:31, 4 Jun

No offence was intended and I can see you have worked on the article as well. My apologies.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 18:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Those who judge without contemplating all aspects of a matter are not worthy of casting judgement. However apology accepted, as long as you remember that there are some things that don't meet the eye at first glance. -- Luverly - (Contribs) (Talk) Grammar Nazi, Mum , BFF & NotM, CUN , GMP . - Perkele! 18:33, 4 Jun