Talk:Buster Keaton

The Proofreading Service has proofreaded your article. Like it? Need more proofreading? Click here!

Proofread today. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:47, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review 1

Humour:	7	Parts were funny, but some was just a bit too random.
Concept:	7	Decent concept.
Prose and formatting:	10	Formatted well.
Images:	8	Decent, but somehow I feel you could get a few bit better ones.
Miscellaneous:	10	10s make boxes go green?
Final Score:	42	Decent start, but could be made better. Read how to be funny and not just stupid again. With some work this could make VFH.
Reviewer:	--- UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:20, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review 2

Buster Keaton

If you ahve any funny ideas for quotes I'd greatly appreciate it.--Dr. Fenwick 22:52, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	8	Damned fine.
Concept:	8.5	Excellent subject for Uncyc, not only notable but a comic as well.
Prose and formatting:	8	Very well done.
Images:	8	Appropriate, well-captioned.
Miscellaneous:	8	I like this. A lot.
Final Score:	40.5
Reviewer:	----OEJ 12:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Endnotes: Only caveat is probably due to my status as a thickoid. What does the sentence --

"Then perhaps the cow that tipped over the lamp that started the great Chicago Fire happened in late October or some month with 28 days."

-- mean? Somehow...I don't get it.

All the authors trying to write biographical articles should have a look at this one. It has exactly the unity of character and plot that I'm always nattering on about. Plus it has it's own voice and style.

Just a few gentle strokes at the end of the second paragraph of Box Office Rivals and it's ready for VFH. (Although I have spectacularly bad judgment about what works on VFH, apparently.)

----OEJ 12:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Featured!

I'm so excited my first featured article I mus sound like a major n00b--Dr. Fenwick 07:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

I've prtoected the page cause I don't want tpeople editing it during the two days it's displayed on the front page. It's protection banner will be removed after that, someone putting a joke about Gary Coleman was the factor in this decision.--Dr. Fenwick 18:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

You can't protect an article. However, an administrator can--Sir Manforman 18:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Yesh. Just to clarify, putting on a template doesn't magically protect a page. Also, we're pretty good with vandalism. Most of us have nothing better to do than patrol recent changes anyhow. Unless we all magically get a life, you've nothing to worry about. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:51 Oct 20, 2007

I think it would be a great if it was like {{FFA/include}} (but only it would be cascade protected) and when it is on the Main Page for the two days, it would automatically be cascade protected--Sir Manforman 18:58, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Oh sorry, thanks.--Dr. Fenwick 03:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)