Talk:Battle of the Sexes
Nice Article[edit source]
I just went through and did a quick proofread, good work! I don't have time for a full fledged pee right now but I'll try and get to it later today. If not and it hasn't been peed on when I get back in a day or two I'll do it then. --OptyC Sucks! 
CUN 19:02, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hea, cool. Thanks... I noticed your changes... Looks like you spotted quite a few typeos which I had left in there! Thanks for having a look at it. :-) MrN
19:08, Mar 22
Pee Review[edit source]
| Humour: | 7 | While there weren't any spit-take inducing moments, I felt it had a very enjoyable feel throughout. The main two criteria I use to judge humor are: Is it funny? (obviously) and Is it consistant? (does it stay funny all the way through?) While this isn't the funniest thing I've read here, it is well worth the space it'll take up on the server. More importantly in some ways, it is also constistant. I was enjoying it just as much at the end as I was at the beginning. |
| Concept: | 9 | Great concept and great execution of the concept. Really nothing much else to say. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | Mostly very nice. The layout is pleasing for the most part although there's a large gap between the introductory paragraph and the first section which is, well, a little ugly not to put too fine a point on it. There were a few typos and whatnot, but I think they're all gone now. |
| Images: | 10 | Even though there was only the one picture of the three lesbians, it totally made the article. What? There were other pictures as well? I hadn't noticed! Seriously, the images are great. I found the pic of Emily Davidson to be especially amusing (in this context of course). The last two images are the weakest, but even so they don't detract from the quality of the article. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | Averaged and rounded up. I hate decimals. |
| Final Score: | 43 | I enjoyed it. Maybe give it just a bit more polishing, but I think it's ready to go as is. |
| Reviewer: | OptyC Sucks! CUN 20:06, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
| |
Thanks Optimuschris, I can't help thinking you have been a little generous there, especially with the images and concept scores, but I know you are right on the humour front. It's more kinda "nice" to read rather than funny, I will see what I can do about that... MrN 
20:37, Mar 22
- LOL! Perhaps the lesbians skewed my judgement a bit on the images, but I do feel it's a great, if uncomplicated, concept. It's got a universal appeal that I think pretty much anybody can relate to. But then again, what the hell do I know? I'm still a noob after all. --OptyC Sucks!
CUN 20:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, and I'm never offended if you want a second opinion. :) --OptyC Sucks! CUN 20:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sure you have a good idea of what you are doing... I just had another look at your user page actually! You do like your ladies that's for sure! Oh, and the Whoa, settle down MrN. You've got to pace yourself with these sorts of praises. comment gave me a chuckle. :-) Hea! You got to start of low you know. ;-) So you have some room to move up later. I'm not saying you are wrong to be giving out a 10, but the trouble with doing that, is that if something else comes along, which is MUCH better, what will you give that? Basically, I judge a 10 to be... well a perfect 10. You do have a few of those on your user page it must be said though! Now if I could just think of a way of making this article a bit more funny... I'm thinking of putting it up for VFH, but as you say, it really just needs a few more gags... MrN 21:06, Mar 22
- I'm sure you have a good idea of what you are doing... I just had another look at your user page actually! You do like your ladies that's for sure! Oh, and the Whoa, settle down MrN. You've got to pace yourself with these sorts of praises. comment gave me a chuckle. :-) Hea! You got to start of low you know. ;-) So you have some room to move up later. I'm not saying you are wrong to be giving out a 10, but the trouble with doing that, is that if something else comes along, which is MUCH better, what will you give that? Basically, I judge a 10 to be... well a perfect 10. You do have a few of those on your user page it must be said though! Now if I could just think of a way of making this article a bit more funny... I'm thinking of putting it up for VFH, but as you say, it really just needs a few more gags... MrN
- Oh, and I'm never offended if you want a second opinion. :) --OptyC Sucks!
Let's VFH this thing.[edit source]
There's nothing I can add. I think it's as good as it can be, sir! Oh hell, I'll nominate it whether you're ready or not. • <-> Mar 23 (19:23)
Quote Necessary?[edit source]
I don't think the quote from Captain Obvious does anything for this, what do you think? Also I think I saw a few spelling/grammar things that I will clean up.--Sakrotac 19:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)