Talk:Alphabetical order

dis article dont make no sence– Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.143.77 (talk • contribs)

Your an idiot.--Mrasdfghjkl 05:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Whereas you're a regular geneous! Aaadddaaammm 01:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

You may want to use ___NO_TOC___ to get rid of the table of contents, so the joke flows through the entire article... I just forget what the exact formatting is. -ChewyLSB 01:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Good idea; that hadn't occured to me, oddly enough. --DW ^III 05:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The article starts really well - actually talking about alphabetical order, in alphabetical order, which is pretty impressive. Unfortunately is denigrates into random silliness. Slithy Tove 08:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

@DWIII: I think you meant "[it] degenerates". --Brogo13 (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Unnecessary and deprecated

Although bean counters don't engender felicitous greetings, haphazard installments just kill lucid meaning. Now ordered, practically questionable rich soup tastes unbelievably velvety. (We're xenic young zombies.)

@MrX:

1. Thumbnails appear on the right by default.
2. Here's the same picture without the |px. Notice how the caption neatly, if coincidentally, fits the frame (Ctrl+ and Ctrl- notwithstanding). Please remove the parameter.

Please please please remove my sanction(s). --Brogo13 (talk) 16:39, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

What's wrong with the picture in the article? MrX blow me 19:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

It's substantially smaller than the other one while its caption is relatively huge. (Not to mention incomplete.) --Brogo13 (talk) 02:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Um ...

@Alula: Why? --Brogo13 (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Your edit here adds pointless links, as well as an unfitting image. 19:39, 23 July 2025 (UTC)