Talk:Alphabetical order

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

dis article dont make no sence– Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.143.77 (talk • contribs)

Your an idiot.--Mrasdfghjkl 05:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Whereas you're a regular geneous! Aaadddaaammm 01:40, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

You may want to use ___NO_TOC___ to get rid of the table of contents, so the joke flows through the entire article... I just forget what the exact formatting is. -ChewyLSB 01:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Good idea; that hadn't occured to me, oddly enough. --DW III CUN.pngOUN.png 05:11, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The article starts really well - actually talking about alphabetical order, in alphabetical order, which is pretty impressive. Unfortunately is denigrates into random silliness. Slithy Tove 08:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

@DWIII: I think you meant "[it] degenerates". --Brogo13 (talk) 11:57, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Unnecessary and deprecated[edit source]

Although bean counters don't engender felicitous greetings, haphazard installments just kill lucid meaning. Now ordered, practically questionable rich soup tastes unbelievably velvety. (We're xenic young zombies.)

@MrX:

  1. Thumbnails appear on the right by default.
  2. Here's the same picture without the |px. Notice how the caption neatly, if coincidentally, fits the frame (Ctrl+ and Ctrl- notwithstanding). Please remove the parameter.[1]

Please please please remove my sanction(s). --Brogo13 (talk) 16:39, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

What's wrong with the picture in the article? MrX blow me Emoji-drool.gif 19:56, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
It's substantially smaller than the other one while its caption is relatively huge. (Not to mention incomplete.) --Brogo13 (talk) 02:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)
  1. Or – allow me.

Um ...[edit source]

@Alula: Why? --Brogo13 (talk) 18:25, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

Your edit here adds pointless links, as well as an unfitting image. Alula.gifAlula.gif 19:39, 23 July 2025 (UTC)