Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion

DO...

For nominators: DO...

1. ... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
2. ... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
3. ... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
4. ... Add {{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
5. ... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.

For voters: DO...

1. ... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
2. ... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so: '''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
3. ... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.

For Administrators: DO...

• ... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
• ... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
• ... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
• ... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.

DON'T...

• ... Revert administrators.
• ... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
• ... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
• ... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like THIS to indicate that they have been kept.

Pages for Deletion

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.

---

How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):

• Check Special:DeadendPages, Special:LonelyPages and Special:UncategorizedPages. Often many articles can slip through the cracks of ICU or QVFD and remain on Uncyclopedia for very long periods before someone randomly stumbles upon them. Editors sometimes also keep useful lists on user subpages.

---

Notes for Administrators:

• Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
• Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
• To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
• If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

---

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

---

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

---

Caw Clan

Score: 3 Elapsed Time: 105653 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	Delete. Seems more creepy than funny?--Sycamore (Talk) 17:36, April 29, 2012 (UTC) oh wonderful. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 23:54, April 29, 2012 (UTC) No. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:13, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Scam letter

Score: -2 Elapsed Time: 105657 hours
Keep (2)	Keep. The new version is subtler than the old one, as much as I like both of them, the new one edges it for me. I like the jarring transitions between very broken English and very fluent English, it works a bit better than the other version's way of presenting the fact it's a scam. --ChiefjusticeWii 14:46, April 29, 2012 (UTC) Much better than before. The subtlety makes it more original and enjoyable. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:12, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Odd one. I am trying to determine if this, or the previous version, is better. I don't think it should be deleted either way, but I'd like delete votes to go back to the old version, or keep votes to keep it as is. Nominally Humane! 02:03 29 Apr
Comments	I'd say it's better now but as an article... I don't know. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 14:29, April 29, 2012 (UTC)

Man v. Food

Score: 2 Elapsed Time: 105659 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (2)	Ew. Srsly? So gross. Hahaha! Actually, it's just kinda stubby and stupid. Picture made me laugh, though. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 29 '12 11:47 (UTC) I'm not really sure which part is supposed to be funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:07, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Unsure. He's notable in his own way, but this article is irredeemable without complete rewrite. Consider this a delete vote that could be changed by a decent rewrite. (I may even be around to add a real vote at some stage.) Nominally Humane! 01:25 29 Apr

Wumbo

Score: 3 Elapsed Time: 105668 hours
Keep (0)	No keep votes.
Delete (3)	This is retarded shit with {{Fix}} tags on it. Let's just delete it already.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 29 '12 3:17 (UTC) Delete it despite the obscure reason for it being added here. Nominally Humane! 01:21 29 Apr Wumbo. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Hello, I'm the main author of Wumbo. If you are going to vote against it, please mention why. I am still trying to improve it (haven't abandoned it yet!). --Craw1 (talk) 21:38, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

Carl Bildt

Score: 3 Elapsed Time: 105712 hours
Keep (2)	Keep. Or I could move it to my namespace for further work. Änjelajs (talk) 18:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC) Author wants to keep working on it, which is commendable. And Bildt is a former Prime Minister of Sweden, so of course he's notable. Unless all of Sweden is unnotable, which I can go along with. Aleister 20:52 30-4-'12
Delete (5)	Please obliterate it. This is completely unfunny. |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 07:05, April 27, 2012 (UTC) Delete.--Mimo&maxus 18:07, April 27, 2012 (UTC) Hmm... Article about Carl Bildt includes a picture drawn by Carl Barks... Erm... What? OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 18:52 27 April 2012 Meh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:05, April 30, 2012 (UTC) Delete. As someone who actually knows who this guy is and knows what he does, I can't safely say this is not funny. --OliOmniOmbudsman 21:34, April 30, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I have no idea who he is. Assuming he is notable then the article is okay with a little effort. If he's not notable then the effort is probably not worth it. Nominally Humane! 01:20 29 Apr If he's not so well known it may be better to just mension him a little in an other article. Änjelajs (talk) 18:10, April 29, 2012 (UTC)