From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: UnPoetia:Walking in a Klingon Wonderland
|
Score: 11.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
ERrodhowlettt 01:05, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
|
For: 14.5
|
- good --ERrodhowlettt 01:05, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For -- The Zombiebaron 03:38, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For -- --PUTTY
  09:49, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
- For poetry makes me puke.--Sog1970 12:20, November 19, 2010 (UTC)
 For. Per above, I guess. —Sir Socky   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:28, 19 November 2010- For. --ERpatient 01:41, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For. ~
 09:30, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For.--Sycamore (Talk) 12:18, November 20, 2010 (UTC)
- For Landsliding. But c'mon, someone do a real good audio before it's featured. Aleister 12:40 20 11
- For. Almost forgot to vote for, what with trying to cause drama and all that. Style
 Guide 14:53, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
- For-I suppose voting for my own article is a good idea... --,':-( sir Ch00_Bakka )-:', 20:39, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- For --60.230.126.40 08:07, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- For. --144.137.6.119 06:28, November 27, 2010 (UTC)
- 4--144.131.25.107 06:01, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
- For. Was wavering until the wombat line - that got a good, solid laugh, so this is a good, solid vote. --UU - natter
 10:20, Nov 30
- For. ChiefjusticePS3 09:39, December 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Against: 3
|
- Against. Don't see it as a feature. Not enough Klingon in it.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:37, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- There really isn't enough klingon in it... where's the strength stuff and the war stuff and the honour stuff? It could be any violent bunch that dislikes Star Trek at this point... ~
 *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101122 - 18:52 (UTC)
- Against. per the lack of audio. Also, I loath featuring Christmas content before the start of advent. Mn-z 22:08, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- If i could find a good instrumental version of walking in a winter wonderland i'd do it myself, but all the versions I can find have someone singing, so... --,':-( sir Ch00_Bakka )-:', 20:53, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Per Mn-z, I'd give it a vote too if it had a good audio, pref. with music in the background (there has to be a musical version of the song somewhere to use as a background). Maybe if it's featured it can be up in mid-December sometime. Not a bad page. Aleister 3:05 19 11
- Comment. Are ERpatient and ERrodhowlett the same person using socks? RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:39, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. Klingon Klingon Klingon Klingon kling kling kling. Close your eyes, imagine all that Klingon is in the article, and vote FOR. Style Guide 15:44, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- It has too many lazy lines in there, in other words if you are going to spoof a Klingon Wonderland, at least at something more than a few Spock or Kirk jokes. It looks like half an idea at best to me and certainly not a feature in it's current state.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:02, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. That's a load of bollocks Romartus - the idea works the way it is and you know that as well as I do. You just want to vote against on some grounds, admit it. You do it all the time. Style Guide 16:20, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- It's not a feature in my view and that is what I think. Simples! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:57, November 21, 2010 (UTC)
- It's not based on what klingons actually are, it's based on the stereotype of klingons as bloodthirsty bastards.--,':-( sir Ch00_Bakka )-:', 21:04, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Klingons are actually fiction Choobakka. Pay enough money to the Gene Roddenberry estate or who ever holds the commercial rights to the name, and they could be the anything you like them to be! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:49, November 26, 2010 (UTC)
- Comment. The funny thing is, this was originally nominated by someone who spends his whole time vandalizing articles. --,':-( sir Ch00_Bakka )-:', 22:31, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For. Per above, I guess. 
