Uncyclopedia:VFH/Osama bin Laden

Article: Osama bin Laden	Score: 0
Nominated by:	EMC^[TALK]04:56 Jun 22 2014 04:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
For: 3	Hilarious from beginning to end. --EMC^[TALK]04:56 Jun 22 2014 For. -- MagicBus Talk to me! 16:12, 22 June 2014 (UTC) For. I AM NOT A ROBOT! FAKEHATER spam me 05:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. Sorry guys. Per comments below. J F C 13:13. Jun 25 Darnit. I was all set to rave over it and maybe vote "YES!!" two or three times using a few socks but then I got to the fresh fetuses and kinda lost interest. Aside from being icky, that's too far over the top to be funny -- the kind of thing a Republican might say about him. I skimmed the rest. Too much obvious nonsense IMHO. Sorry guys. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC) This is funnier. Feature it instead. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:42, 27 Jun 2014
Comments	I think "Tim Osman" died of kidney problems long before 2011. I also think he had less to do with the actual attacks of 911 than I did. This is a funny article, but it appears to have accepted what Robin Cook (RIP) might have called the "database" version of history. My world view is so far from that, so even though parts of this article are very funny the whole thing leaves me not smiling at all. :( J F C 13:17. Jun 25 And I think that's irrelevant. If you think it's funny vote for it. (Note that there are even some hints in the article that the Seal thing was a little bit staged.) I've leafleted at TruthOut rallies and I still would probably have voted For. if it hadn't been for those fetuses. Do the orders still stand, sir...? Snarglefoop (talk) 03:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC) "Of course the orders still stand, Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Vice President Cheney 10:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC) You know, I'm pretty sure you said something about using your opinions of POV to bias your appreciation of humour... didn't you? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:36, 27 Jun 2014 No, no, never, of course not, I wouldn't do that! It wouldn't follow the pure Uncyclopedia party line ("Humor sit omne hominis") so I would never consider it! Snarglefoop (talk) 03:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC) I wasn't exactly talking to you. Why do you think I only put one colon? I suppose it could have been to ward off the manholes, but I thought it was commonly understood that only crossbows can do that. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 03:54, 27 Jun 2014 I had made a comment, and your comment came after it, and of course all comments which come anywhere on the page after any statement by me must of course be in response to my comment, right? Or something like that...Snarglefoop (talk) 04:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC) Comment. Noobs. I don't think it's funny. That's why I said " the whole thing leaves me not smiling at all." Thanks for all the attention though. J F C 09:20. Jun 27