Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Write a Progressive Rock Song

Article: HowTo:Write a Progressive Rock Song	Score: 1 mentions of King Crimson
Nominated by:	Guildensternenstein 00:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 6	Nom & For. Thought I might sneak in a self-nom while everyone's busy with PLS. Yeah, I know. Pee reviews are here and here. —Guildensternenstein 00:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC) For. --Docile hippopotamus 02:47, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Sup. For.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 02:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:34, Mar 16 For. Whee. *Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 04:13, Mar. 17, 2009
Against: 5	Against. I like it, but the idea of the article being featured scares me at night. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 00:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Against. Djdorama 01:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Against. I dunno...almost seems too serious--StonedJeff 19:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Meh As with the techno one. We get it. "Progressive rock is pretentious." Let's move on. -RA HB 05:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Imagine what Floyd would have sounded like with a roster of virtuoso musicians like Yes, Genesis, GENTLE GIANT, ELP etc etc etc. It wouldn't have been Pink Floyd.-- 11:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC) Go fix the damn banners! My eyes bleed from within! ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 01:20, 15 March 2009 (UTC) Abstain. subject is too obscure Mnb'z 03:35, 16 March 2009 (UTC) Abstain. Obscure? Nope. Sort of per RAHB, except that I kinda like it enough to not vote against. --UU - natter 13:25, Mar 16