User talk:Shimdidly
Good day, Shimdidly, and on behalf of the royal community of Benson, welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. We hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to the right... yeah. Anyway, now that you're here and one of us, here are a few good links for n00bies:
If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
We hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! If you treat Uncyclopedia well, it will reward you with a whole new world of philosophy, science, literature, opinion, and just plain classic comedy. Please sign your name on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (
) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help with anything, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or ask at the Village Dump (article-related concerns should go in Pee Review). Again, welcome!--Andorin Kato 05:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
On Uncyclopedia blows[edit source]
Whoops, I restored your userpage, but it seems you may not have wanted that. My mistake. Anyway, your article got deleted. So what? It happens to everyone, and if you really think your article deserved a chance, then ask an admin to restore it to your userspace. Was the article tagged with an {{ICU}}? The deletion log says it "failed quality assurance". I never saw the article, but most everything in HTBFANJS is pretty straightforward. There's no reason to go on a political rampage about freedom of speech and fairness, because we already have an article titled Uncyclopedia is the worst. If you're not careful, your rant may end up there.
And we do have an article about Niggers, didn't you see it? Uncyclopedia ain't about the politics of fairness and censorship and all that crap; write something funny, or click on the red "X" on your screen. There are less angry ways of dealing with your problems (like going to the Help forum and asking why your article got deleted, and what you can do to avoid getting deleted in the future.) Really truly, most of us here don't want to be seen as dicks. Just ask nicely. --The Acceptable 
Cainad 
(Fnord) 03:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- As one of the guys who deleted your article I'd be happy to tell you why. Although the article was longer than most of the one line/paragraph offerings that most people add and are subsequently deleted, the main issue for me was that it came across as random nonsense which seemed to have little to do with the subject matter. If it had improved the second time around when another Admin deleted I can't say. If you want a copy placing in your userspace to see if you can expand and improve let me know. -- Sir Mhaille
(talk to me)
You Call This An Article?[edit source]
Understanding women is something that men have tried to do for thousands of years and have yet to reach a desirable level of knowledge on the subject. Many claim that it is impossible to do.
Origins[edit source]
According to the Bible:The first people conceived on the Earth were Adam and Eve. Based on the assumption that Adam was male and Eve was indeed female, we can draw the conclusion that Adam did in fact not understand Eve.
P.S. Urban Dictionary is lame. They can't even get the sources or definitions even somewhat correct.