User talk:AtheistJesus
Welcome![edit source]
Hello, AtheistJesus, and thanks for joining Uncyclopedia! Before editing further, please take a gander at our Beginner's Guide. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, check out the following pages:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
- Votes for Highlight Page - read the very best articles and have your say about what goes onto our front page
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, ask at the community forum or in the chatroom, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, our Adopt-a-Noob program can bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:48, November 19, 2012 (UTC)
UnNews:Complete idiots attempt to bury Osama in water[edit source]
Funny stuff man. --WesMan20 (talk) 19:17, November 24, 2012 (UTC)
UnNews[edit source]
Two little style things I noticed about formatting in your eagle article. To make a new paragraph, you need to separate two blocks of text. Pressing enter once won't do it. I'll show you what you did (1), how I corrected it (2) and the two effects.
1) Lots of example text here to help you and now I am going to press enter. Here you can see the next sentence does not look like a new paragraph. 2) Lots of example text here to help you and now I am going to press enter twice. This is the effect that you want.
This gives you:
1) Lots of example text here to help you and now I am going to press enter. Here you can see the next sentence does not look like a new paragraph.
2) Lots of example text here to help you and now I am going to press enter twice.
This is the effect that you want.
Then, the other thing is to do with Sources. I used to do this all the time, that's why I saw the mistake. You can leave "Author" blank, but you cannot leave "Publisher" blank, because that creates this effect:
- Leverage "Argentina complains to UK over Queen Elizabeth Land 'imperialism'" ', December 22, 2012
I don't know why Wikipedia comes up but it looks retarded. Similarly, if you completely delete the author line, you get this:
- {{{author}}} "Argentina complains to UK over Queen Elizabeth Land 'imperialism'" Guardian, December 22, 2012
So leave author blank, or put a silly name in, or you own name in, whatever you want. But put something for pub.
*{{source|url=URL HERE |title=HEADLINE HERE |author=SILLY NAME HERE OR BLANK |pub=HUFFINGTON POST |date=December 22, 2012}}