User talk:Anton199/Freemasons

--174.45.208.146 23:43, January 21, 2011 (UTC) you stupid bastereds how dare of you to tramble on gods good work!!![[

---

Link title]]

Is that so? → I am greatSoup? 23:47 21-Jan-11 ←

Hey, someone should make a dalek referance. I was reading about freemasons, and apparently they all have to worship the "Supreme Being" =P

Dalek referance

There should be a dalek referance. After all, they do believe in a supreme being =P

This particular article about the Freemasons is the worst that I have ever read. The grammar is all messed up. The article as a whole is totally bogus. I can't believe I wasted my time trying to read it. I also noticed that the author didn't bother to put in a works cited section. I he or she had, it would have made it more credible. So, between the lousy grammar, bogus material and lack of works cited, the article is worthless. If it were in print, I wouldn't use it to scrape the dog poop off the bottom of my shoes.

Cool

I'm right behind you dude. Not had a chance to look at this or what you have done with it yet, but I will have lots of time soon to put into this, although maybe not too much in the next day or so. I will post a load of links and stuff and such here soon also... Good to be editing with you. :) JFC 00:15. Jun 29

I have only done the most essential part, which was to delete the long random lists which benefited from years of IP additions and irrelevant images. But I'll do more today. Anton (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

As an overall tone, how about we both go public and both admit now that we are both freemasons ourselves? As such it might fit if we wrote this article in tone and style as such might have been written by a freemason. Which we are. Not. Or are. Obviously. Something. Just an idea... Also. ... There is a book called Freemasons for dummies which is just begging for a parody... JFC 17:51. Jun 29

Great idea! There is an alternative version of the article at the mirror ([1]), which is actually a translation of the Turkish version, where the first template states that the author joined the Freemasons just to make this article (it may be of some interest to you). But we might be experienced Freemasons.

I will make a few more cuts right now and add a few ideas. What I am thinking of is that Freemasons currently want to destroy all the conspiracy theories concerning their group. In this case, an appropriate point of view would be that Freemasons are not a secret society at all, and I found an interesting revision in the history of this article, where an editor adds a sentence saying that "Freemasons are a gentleman club. Nothing special" or something like that (I lost the link to that edit). Just an idea for the point of view we can adopt. Anton (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2014 (UTC)