User talk:14.178.187.76
Oh Dear...[edit source]
Hello, 14.178.187.76, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Unfortunately, we've noticed that your contributions - not to put too fine a point on it - have been crap. Basically, we think you're a spammer/vandal/10-year-old. But don't despair! We have ways to make you talk.. ahem. I mean, there are ways to get you out of this mess.
- Beginner's Guide
- Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends
- If you're a vandal, this may be your wake up-call!
- How to be funny and not just stupid
If you read anything at all, make it the above four links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
- About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
- Everything you ever wanted to know, but were afraid to ask
- Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
Good luck and I'm sorry you got off to such a bad start. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help or think this template has been placed unfairly, please ask me or an admin on their talk page, rather than going bat-fuck-insane. Alternatively you can ask at the Dump, or add the following: {{help}}
to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Again, welcome!
We don't care if Gosper had a better formula; this is a funny wiki, not a wiki for facts. You can add onto the article if you want, but please don't delete stuff if that means getting rid of jokes. DaniPine3 (talk) 15:54, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- hey danny boi no war no bully my addition about *gosper greatest formula* is opening door for funny things in future, stirling formula is too dumb and seriousness 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:03, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- this is not a calculus wiki, we don't care which formula is better. get your stupid Gosper formula somehere else. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- you danny boy me again here we sould asking here for sure 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- dude your English is horrible I can't even understand what you're trying to tell me. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- i just make thing better why you guy bully me why don't you guy read my addition 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've read it, and it's pretty unnecessary. I just don't get why you have to delete the other thing, which is perfectly fine. If you have a personal grudge against that formula, that is something that has nothing to do with this wiki, and therefore not needed. And I'm not bullying you; as a matter of fact, I don't even know who you are. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- i have a great idea why dont you guy readd my addition but not remove the stirling formula i dont know but you guy cannot deny the formula gosper himself that took him a year to find the formula he is a great physician 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've already told you; this is not a factual wiki, it's a funny one. We make jokes here. I congratulate that Gosper for finding out that formula, but it's really unnecessary to add that information if the intention isn't to be funny. There are probably more wikis out there that are more concerned with math-related things. Ever heard of RationalWiki? DaniPine3 (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- then stirling formula should not be there because of it seriousness, it should have been in RationalWiki for a long time, my addition is not a harmful addition, til there is a fair for me, so i must ask people who lock me from editing paper 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- In case you haven't got the message already, i'll just say it extremely loud and clear: we don't consider that edit of yours funny, and that's why it got reverted. Continuing to insist that it is and complaining about me protecting the page because you were trying to start an edit war over it isn't gonna help your case at all. 17:01, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- then stirling formula should not be there because of it seriousness, it should have been in RationalWiki for a long time, my addition is not a harmful addition, til there is a fair for me, so i must ask people who lock me from editing paper 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've already told you; this is not a factual wiki, it's a funny one. We make jokes here. I congratulate that Gosper for finding out that formula, but it's really unnecessary to add that information if the intention isn't to be funny. There are probably more wikis out there that are more concerned with math-related things. Ever heard of RationalWiki? DaniPine3 (talk) 16:46, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- i have a great idea why dont you guy readd my addition but not remove the stirling formula i dont know but you guy cannot deny the formula gosper himself that took him a year to find the formula he is a great physician 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- I've read it, and it's pretty unnecessary. I just don't get why you have to delete the other thing, which is perfectly fine. If you have a personal grudge against that formula, that is something that has nothing to do with this wiki, and therefore not needed. And I'm not bullying you; as a matter of fact, I don't even know who you are. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:36, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- i just make thing better why you guy bully me why don't you guy read my addition 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:28, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- dude your English is horrible I can't even understand what you're trying to tell me. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:27, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- you danny boy me again here we sould asking here for sure 14.178.187.76 (talk) 16:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
- this is not a calculus wiki, we don't care which formula is better. get your stupid Gosper formula somehere else. DaniPine3 (talk) 16:23, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Dude, really? Again?[edit source]
You're really begging to get banned... πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 22:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- do you read watch again i just added and didn't remove anything on it 14.178.187.76 (talk) 22:35, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- this is a site for anyone who want editing not for such worser admin like your and the man who lock it, so do not remove my addition because it do nothing harmful 14.178.187.76 (talk) 22:40, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- you guy lock a page without following policy it is called vandal and consider bullying 14.178.187.76 (talk) 22:42, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- im wondering if there is a bestest way to report you guy 14.178.187.76 (talk) 22:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- first, the user that locked it is a woman, not a man. second, you're throwing a tantrum over such a little detail; if we keep removing it, it's because it doesn't really add anything to the article, not because we don't want you to edit or because we want to bully you. third, you don't even bother to register, which is the proof that you don't really want to do any meaningful contribution here and just want to do that stupid change... πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 22:44, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- im not improve until this question is answered hey have you wondered, writing the word *make* in present participle just by removing the *e* and adding the *ing* so it is *making* but what about *being* why not *bying* or *bing* chilling, i bet you cant answer it haha so i can call you by every nickname i made like *pinocchio3* 14.178.187.76 (talk) 22:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure that happens because if the same happened to "being" then that would be just "bing", and that looks more like an onomatopeia than a verb. plus, in making the i sound is short, whereas in being the i sound is long, hence the e, that acts like a second i. there, I answered your question. happy now? and please don't call me *pinocchio3*. also you should really try to improve your English if you want to write in an English-speaking website. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 23:00, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users, or by an entire institution or organization. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.