Uncyclopedia talk:What Uncyclopedia is not

Thanks to Sir Codeine for the note-Sgore 23:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Also, for full appreciation I recommend this Article be read alongside the Wikipedia article it is a parody of: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not -Sgore 00:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Honey they shunk my article...and completely rewrote it....

aw. Oh well, I suppose I can understand why they did it and stuff I guess, I just spent a lot of time...i mean...someone could have at least told me or something before they... or...yeah...oh well...darn...Ok then though.-Sgore 20:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

This page still exists if you'd like to move your earlier version to there. I was actually very sad that I had to rewrite what was here. --EMC ^[TALK] 23:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

I vastly prefer the funny and not serious version. And I don't think it needs rewritten... I mean, you can get all that info from other places already. Couldn't this be somewhere else? What uncyclopedia is not/serious, perhaps?

Well, it's not entirely serious. It's semi-serious I suppose. --EMC ^[TALK] 01:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Compared to the last verison, it's pretty damn serious. The completely not serious version is way better, and feels more... uncyclopedic. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:25, 13 Aug 2007

Is there anyway we can merge the two versions?-Sgore 01:54, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Feel like Uncyclopedia is sort of social-networking...

It sorta is, when people abuse the talk pages and stuff. Cute Zekrom! _{Use Fusion Bolt NOW!! • It's super effective!} 01:15, March 5, 2012 (UTC)