Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/box
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
box[edit source]
|
Whoops! You have been given the Poison Pee Award |
|
| Have you read the Pee Review Guidelines? ________________________________________________ this review is not NEARLY long enough. |
| Humour: | 6 | Starts out pretty strong, but it falls apart like a wet cardboard box full of...heavy things. There's not that many good jokes here. And the section about the theory of boxes was poorly written. But it can be better with some help. |
| Concept: | 9 | I like the direction you're going with this one. Clever idea. |
| Prose and formatting: | 2 | You need some grammar lessons, kid. I found several spelling errors as well. Please work on your prose; this article has a good idea, but it's gonna be very sensitive to how it's written. |
| Images: | 0 | No images. You could put in a ton of images of boxes, people with boxes, people on boxes, people in boxes, boxes in people, etc. |
| Miscellaneous: | 0 | Nothing too special about an article this short. Take some more time with an article before moving it to the mainspace. |
| Final Score: | 17 | This guy needs a lot of work. Props for the idea, though, this is pretty clever. |
| Reviewer: | ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF 23:18, 12 December 2007 (UTC) | |