Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Watch Kitty Porn (again)

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Why?:Watch Kitty Porn (again)

This is the second review of this article (1st review can be seen of discussion page). I'd love to see this article featured one day and have had tons of help with it from the community here as they seem to love the concept. Cheapinitreal 05:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Why?:Watch Kitty Porn is being reviewed by CajekHi! Your Source for Fine Scented Pee And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him

Wild Cajek appears! Wild Cajek used Review! (Thank you for that, Fag)   Le Cejak • <May 14, 2008 [18:14]>

Humour:	7.8	avg of each section intro -9- OMFG, what is wrong with you?! You should be deported. Also, the introduction not only (1) told an interesting and funny story, but (2) put weird thoughts in my mind. Thoughts that should never be mentioned again, except later in this article. So far, so great! I hardly ever give 9s! Warning: Kitty Porn Is Not For Everyone -9- I like the warning here, especially that part about pouring beer on your cereal. This article is pretty crazy and hilarious. Some people may not think this is funny, but they are too sheltered. I, for one, think this section is getting back to the roots of what a good article is: not complicated, just outrageous. Initial Reactions To Viewing Pussy In Porn -8- I liked this section too! Dang, you're a good writer! I keep thinking that, if this was on VFH, it would make it barely because a lot of people might just be turned off by this (also because the page is really badly organized, but I'll get to that later). This, like another thing I reviewed, is like Wooden Condom, and my own article HowTo:Sexually Stimulate an Ant. Acceptance and Benefits -7- It's an okay ending. I like the length of this article, by the way. It adds to the weirdness of it all. Possible Side Effects -6- Lists are lame. You should try to make this a full paragraph somehow. Even though it's not a bad list, we're shooting for vfh on this, and we need to redo this.
Concept:	8	When I read the title, and when you whored it to me on IRC, I was rolling my eyes. "Oh, great, another PRON article." When I started reading, I realized that this isn't stupid or badly written, it's actually pretty good. Your article is bursting with images and little did you know things down the side, though. You need to make your article pretty.
Prose and formatting:	7	The writing is not the problem, it's the images and templates. I like all the images, sure, but they should not be left-right-left (staggered) as some reviewers suggest. They should all be on the right side, to make it look more like an article and not a webpage. If it looks like a webpage, people will think it's noobish even if they shouldn't. You need to pare down your images and choose only three or so. Maybe only one of those "did you know" things would be okay.
Images:	8	I liked all the images and the captions, but it will be up to you to choose the best ones to keep. My favorite image and caption, in case you were wondering, was the one with the cat splayed out with the caption Look at this saucy little thing enticing you. Keep that one, and pick and choose your other images. Don't clog up the article.
Miscellaneous:	7.7	{{Pee|7.8|8|7|8}}
Final Score:	38.5	You really surprised me on this! Call me when you've redecorated your article, and maybe I'll nominate it for you! Check out Wooden Condom, and HowTo:Sexually Stimulate an Ant for ideas on layout.
Reviewer:	Le Cejak • <May 14, 2008 [18:42]>

Yay, reference to my condom article! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 18:57, May 14

This article, and this review, reminded me of your condom. ...I mean, your condom article.   Le Cejak • <May 14, 2008 [19:02]>