Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/War of Gibson
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Uh, I just want someone to tell me if it sucks or not. The concept began with cartmans tourettes and just spiraled from there. Thank you. --Lord Serioch 04:23, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
War of Gibson[edit source]
| Humour: | 2 | It's all in the concept. If yew had a good idea for this article it wouldn't have been random word streams about "insert saddam hussein / george bush / osama bin laden / south park character here". Instead it's just a bunch of words put together to randomly kill characters with the minimum of humour. If yew avoid this, and look at the "concept" comments below soemthing could come of this article. |
| Concept: | 2 | The article name conjoures up alot for the imagination and has a lot of promise, but the article itself just totally fucks it up. It's this part of the article, the concept, that leeches off all the other parts and leaves them with next to nothing with which to live.
A completely randumb article to let loose your innermost celebrity-namedropping wishes. If yew wanted this to be a good article, yew could change it to be based on something relevant to Mel Gibson, maybe Braveheart would be a good idea. It could be turned into a parody of the story of Braveheart, maybe it could be changed so that the entire story applies to Mel Gibson's personal life. That was just off the top of my head, yew could do anything with it. Gibson guitars, Gibson Amphitheatre, Gibson cocktail, Gibson in Louisiana, the |
| Prose and formatting: | 3 | The grammar is half-decent, but there are misspellings everywhere and random inserts that don't really make any sense. I guess it's vaguely coherent (as coherent as one can get with a randumb stream) but again, it all just basically needs replacing. Yew could really develop something from this, it's a promising idea. |
| Images: | 5 | Adequate placing, but yew could do so much better with relevance to the article. Any good on photoshop? Yew could fake a battle up. The first picture is awful, absolutely awful. Low quality, probably made on paint. Either get rid of it or make it more simple, as in a simple flag. |
| Miscellaneous: | 3 | Averaged using {{Pee|2|2|3|5}} |
| Final Score: | 15 | I hate to be a dick (and lower massively my average Pee scores given out) but this article is, well, terrible. ICU-worthy, unless yew don't intend to take my comments on board in which case it's VFD. Basically, the best thing to do is do completely the opposite of what ywv done. Sorry! |
| Reviewer: | ~Fag x FS 13:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC) | |