Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:ThaBritMan/Hentai
User:ThaBritMan/Hentai[edit source]
I'd Just like to say if you do review this for me I will personally thank you as i have posted a few articles and none yet have been reviewed. --Cool I Get A Signature 22:23, November 25, 2011 (UTC)
- I'll get it. If you want to personally thank me I can email you my address. --Black Flamingo 13:47, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
Humour: | 5 | Ok so what you have here is a good start, but there are a few things you should probably take another look at.
Intro More generally, the intro can get a little confusing at times, and some of the prose isn't very well put together. In this part of the article, you're supposed to introduce your subject as well as the style of humour you're going to use. In yours, I'm a tad confused as to what you're trying to say. At times it sounds like you're conflating animé and hentai, like where you say Pokémon was the first hentai. But then at other times you talking about it more truthfully, like where you say it entails "octopuses raping thirteen year olds". So which is it? Are you going to pretend animé is just basically hentai? Or are you going for a more realistic approach? Origins The Pikachu joke is pretty good, but it's probably the only discernible joke in there. Remember, be as funny as you can at all times! Look at each of your sentences and see how you can twist them to make a joke. Mislead the reader and then deliver a good punchline - that is essentially how you make people laugh, it's all about surprise. Style of Hentai Examples Animal/Human Rights Activists To wrap up this section I'm just going to add this: as a whole you could do with more jokes in the article. If you're writing a comedy article, basically every sentence should either contain a joke or set up a joke. Obviously sometimes you're going to need exposition, but there's no reason you can't make this funny too. I would highly recommend you get the joke ratio up. Look at some of our best of, and see how they have a hell of a lot of good jokes. This should be what you aim for. |
Concept: | 5 | You don't seem to demonstrate much knowledge of hentai, I would recommend you read the Wikipedia article on it. I've skimmed it and it's quite an interesting read. Your history of hentai is very much lacking in accuracy and besides Pokémon (which isn't really hentai) you don't even discuss any contemporary examples. You also need to settle on how you want to portray hentai. For some of the article you treat it truthfully, at other times you make up crazy lies. Either is fine but you can't do both; it's too confusing. Pick one stance and stick to it. For instance, it could be quite humorous and ironic to pretend that all animé is hentai, or that hentai is live-action. |
Prose and formatting: | 5 | First of all you need to be consistent in your writing style. You need to find your "voice". For an article that is just generally about something interesting, I would usually recommend the encyclopaedic style. It's up to you of course, but if it's all over the place like it is now then it's going to look sloppy and confusing.
Intro Origins
|
Images: | 4 | For something that is so visually interesting I'm very surprised there aren't more images here. You don't really even have any images of hentai, expect the Pikachu thing, which is just more frightening than funny. And no main image in the first paragraph? This is important for introducing the style and theme of the article, as well as gripping your reader. Images also just make things look prettier, you know?
The Pikachu one is ok, but I'm not really a fan of the dead bodies one. I suppose it kind of fits in with your "hentai is real" idea, but unless you make this the foundation of your article, I would get rid of it. Remember when you strengthen your concept that your images will also have to be consistent. |
Miscellaneous: | 5 | Overall impressions. |
Final Score: | 24 | Ok, so a little bit more work and this should be a better article in no time. Try to get a few more jokes in there give it a very, very thorough proofread (there are a couple of users around the place who would probably be happy to help if you don't trust your own skills, and there's always spellchecking software). I would also recommend you read our featured articles and our writing tips for a better idea of what passes for humour around here. Sure, the article has a few flaws but don't let it get you down, most people's early articles aren't masterpieces. Apart from that, good work. If there's anything I've said here that you want me to explain better, or if you want my opinion on anything I might have missed, or even if you're just lonely, please let me know on my talky page and I'll try to help. Keep up the good work and I hope the review is ok. |
Reviewer: | --Black Flamingo 15:37, January 7, 2012 (UTC) |