Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia Appeal
Uncyclopedia Appeal[edit source]
NonchalantCaterpillar 15:43, November 17, 2010 (UTC)
I'll get this within the next 24 hours. --
18:25, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
I'm doing it now. -- 20:25, November 30, 2010 (UTC)
| Humour: | 8 | So I gave this an 8 because I found this quite funny. But I do think that others might not. So I'll tell you what I think others might find unfunny.
So first I think others might find the whole "pool of human waste" idea that you use throughout the article unneeded. And here's why: I think they might find the whole idea crude an rude. Substituting the shock effect for actual humor. And usally I find that kind of thing to be stupid and unfunny. But in this rare case I found it very very funny (and well writen). Maybe instead of just flat out saying it you could hint to it (with the use of links, asides, and pictures). I also think that others will find the whole fetish/children's femur bones thing unfunny. for the same reason. Now this one I don't think can be fixed. Because I think it's one of those things that some people will "get" and find funny, and others won't. Now myself, the only things I actually found wrong with the humor was this: I see you use the <s> alot. I think that using the <s> is something to be used with discretion. Don't over use it. That is when you're using it for humor reasons. And lastly in the begining and a couple times after that you refer to uncyclopedia as a community. Then later you say "the Uncyclopedia, ehrm...community", as if you had to think about it. Well that's not consistent with what you said before that. So try to stay consistent. Always. It will always make your article make more sense. Always try to read thruogh your article out loud after you're done writing it. Try to see if it flows the right way. |
| Concept: | 8 | I think the Concept of this article is great. What a unique idea, to parody the appeal from wikipedia. And I think it is so funny, how we parody EVERYTHING that wikipedia does. They probably feel like they can't do anything without being laughed at and mocked by us. But yes, I think this aricle was ascential for uncyclopedia. |
| Prose and formatting: | 9 | I gave this a nine because I really don't know. I'm really bad at grammar, spelling, and the rest. But I gave it a nine because I didn't see anything wrong. But I figured it couldn't be perfect. |
| Images: | 7 | Now I only gave this a seven because there were only three images. And they were not verry outstanding. Not to say they were bad. They wern't! The were fine, just not outsdanding. |
| Miscellaneous: | 10 | One of my favorite jokes it the wole article was tha part about uncyclopedia being the 1teenth most popular website in the world. I found it so funny because it was just so silly. |
| Final Score: | 42 | So yes this article was actually really good. I think this could become a feture with just a little bit of work. Good job! |
| Reviewer: | -- 05:06, December 1, 2010 (UTC)
| |