This has been expanded significantly since its first pee review. Cap'n Ben was helpful, and so can you! --Hyperbole 11:58, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
| Humour:
|
8
|
avg of all the little section things
- Intro -7- Good, concise introduction to the topic at hand. Even if you didn't know who Turing was, this paragraph could introduce you to the subject at hand. The pic makes the section funny (but that will be included in the image score).
- The first Turing Duck Test -8- Partly this is an 8 because of the concept. The concept is, itself, hilarious. I can just imagine a dude in a lab coat chasing a frightened duck around and putting it in a sterile white room.
- "Walks Like a Duck" Test -8- A little short, but still worth a giggle. Describe the surroundings of the subjects. Does the duck have handcuffs on, or is it just the human? If not why not, because that confused me (or I'm stupid... or both).
- "Quacks Like a Duck" Test -8- Still short, but above average. The concept is still crisp and fresh at this point. I am jealous of this article. Must destroy.
- Conclusion of the test -9- You and your article are riding the wave of recent minimalist (about two or three essay-pages long) realistic (non-illogicopedia style) articles. I could see this getting VFH either now or with very little editing. In fact, this style may very well be your thing.
- Modern Turing Duck Tests -9- the serious tone and weird subject matter is exactly what I was talking about. After two or three features in this style, though, you're going to have to branch out.
- "Walks Like a Duck" Test -7- Interesting, but it's the same joke as last time, plus it's short. Oh, well, it's not exactly the same, so it's still a 7.
- "Quacks Like a Duck" Test -9- Good stuff.
- Conclusion -7- kind of a weak ending, but okay nonetheless.
|
| Concept:
|
9
|
This is where the article shines: it's the mental images that make this article work. I think you should describe the Turing testing site a little more. Other than that, it's hard for me to see what to add.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
8
|
I saw some mistakes, but overall it flows very well.
|
| Images:
|
8
|
above average images, especially that first one.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
8.3
|
avg'd via {{pee}}
|
| Final Score:
|
41.3
|
Oh hell, I'm gonna nominate it. It's definitely worth a shot.
|
| Reviewer:
|
Le Cejak • <16:55, 08 Jun 2008>
|
