Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Lion King

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

The Lion King

I feel that it needs a pee. (I did not create the article, but it's been here for two years without pee.)~ 05:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Lots of articles don't get a pee - if someone takes the time to review this, will the feedback be acted on? Or will this be a waste of the reviewer's time? --UU - natter 11:22, Apr 27

At this point I doubt the feedback would be taken into consideration. lol HouseMDfan 12:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

Unless someone wants to adopt this article, I don't think it would be worth the trouble reviewing it. And it someone wants to review this, I'd suggest doing a cleanup (if not a rewrite) before getting it reviewed. As it is, a current review would focus to much on pointing the obvious. --Mnb'z 15:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Humour:	0
Concept:	0
Prose and formatting:	0
Images:	0
Miscellaneous:	0
Final Score:	0	Executive decision: review closed. Only request a review if you're gonna act on it please.
Reviewer:	--UU - natter 10:37, May 7