Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Archers
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Archers[edit source]
I stuck this up for review before and had some useful comments, which I have incorporated. Any more gratefully received, but remember this is a British institution, so may not play so well over the pond.-Asahatter (annoy) 20:43, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 8.5 | Good stuff, like where you've gone with this. |
| Concept: | 8 | Yep, it's a good concept, although as you observe, it may not travel well. |
| Prose and formatting: | 9 | Well written, no problems. I could probably find some if I searched hard enough (I'm picky like that), but certainly nothing glaring! |
| Images: | 8 | It has images, and they are relevant. That's more than many articles manage. |
| Miscellaneous: | 9 | It may well be my British restraint that means I have an aversion to giving tens, but I did like this. |
| Final Score: | 42.5 | You took on board the previous review and ran with it. A significant improvement, well done! Oh, I don't know if you've considered adding a UK-ish template to it? |
| Reviewer: | --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC) | |
As to useful comments, I'm fresh out. Did think of a couple as I started reading, only to find them included later on.
The prevalence of our beloved transatlantic cousins hereabouts might reduce the chances of a good VFH run, but nonetheless I'd say this is a job well done. I doff my cap in an approving fashion. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)