Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Robert Mugabe's Cricket Almanac
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Robert Mugabe's Cricket Almanac[edit source]
I'd like to ask some cricket fan about general reviewing this article. Thank's from the mountain as we say in Poland.
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 16:02, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
Wow, Uncyclopedians really hate Robert Mugabe. However, I can't blame us because he sucks. I'll take this one. InMooseWeTrust 00:49, January 12, 2010 (UTC)
- Hm... 2day
Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 20:42, January 14, 2010 (UTC) - Sorry, it'll be done in an hour from now. I promise. InMooseWeTrust 23:36, January 14, 2010 (UTC)
| Humour: | 8 | The humor factor is well-introduced by the green box at the top of the article, and the rest of it just reinforces the intro. However, the "bash the dictator" mentality is a bit overdone. |
| Concept: | 8 | While it's always fun to go after a psychopathic dictator, I think you and the rest of Uncyclocommunity is overdoing it. Please, just finish the articles that are already there (VFH them all) and don't write any new ones. Seriously, what will you do when he dies? I don't think he will live another 10 years. |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | Very minor writing errors. It's good for a person who is not a native speaker. You do need some proofreading, but you don't need as much as you think you do. |
| Images: | 8 | The photoshopping of the one picture with Mugabe looks really bad. It might also help to add one more picture, towards the bottom of the article. The other pictures look very good. |
| Miscellaneous: | 6 | Don't write a "conclusion" section; it's not very appropriate in these types of articles. Like I said in the other peer review, it will also help if you add more "Trivia" and other extra sections. Fake sources cited or footnotes would finish up the humor rather nicely. |
| Final Score: | 38 | Please, no more Mugabe jokes. Enough is enough. |
| Reviewer: | InMooseWeTrust 23:56, January 14, 2010 (UTC) | |