Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Pruitt-Igoe
Pruitt-Igoe[edit source]
Well? --EMC [TALK] 19:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
| Humour: | 3 | Do not be afraid to add tasteless humor to the article. |
| Concept: | 6 | It's nothing real significant, but yet there are stuff that people already made that are great. Just don't give up finding stuff that is known to us, yet not written on uncyclopedia. Make sure you make the next big article before anyone else does. |
| Prose and formatting: | 5 | The article is not long enough for a relevant format. Formats are hard to make for some. Don't worry. Just use the guide on how to format your article. I'm sure you will make longer articles next time. |
| Images: | 4 | Articles that short sometimes have few images. You can make more images in the presence of extensive articles. |
| Miscellaneous: | 6 | Nice effort. The improvements shown will hopefully help you next time. |
| Final Score: | 24 | If you have any questions, write them in my talk page and I'll reply to them. |
| Reviewer: | IViking 13:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC) | |
Comment:
EMC - this is IViking - he's been doing short pees around here for a few days now without saying much that's really helpful. He also seems to have missed the point of this article. For my part, I thought it was a little short, but a nicely ironic piece about the "Utopian Community" of P-I. The pic is probably sufficient for the article's length, although another possibly wouldn't go amiss. It would be nice if this could somehow reflect the true nature of P-I while pertaining to show it as this glorious vision you are painting it as. It's well written and formatted, and so forth, and my comment would be more along the lines of "pretty good, although I doubt it would play too well on VFH. Would be nice to see it a bit longer, but looking at the WP article, I'm at a loss to suggest how. Hope this counterpoint helps a little!
IViking - this is EMC. One of our better writers. Have a look a the WP article, and think a little more about what this article's trying to achieve. You may want to rethink your score a bit based on this. (I'm not suggesting just being EMC means he deserves a good score, but the irony of the article makes for a read that raises a smile if you know what it's getting at). And don't think I'm stalking you, by the way, I just keep a close watch on reviews generally. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:59, Feb 29