Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Meteors

My first Uncyclopedia article, and I just want a bit of feedback to see how close I've got to the sitewide standard. Or lack thereof.

---Trafalgar 12:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Humour:	5.5	It pains me to say it, but I didn't laugh. You can improve this by fleshing out your jokes some more. I felt that there was potential for a lot of your jokes, but you sort of left them (and me) dangling.
Concept:	5	Meteors are born, they do nothing, and die. This article has great potential, but your approach leaves things to be desired. Give it a little spice, some (not too much) absurdity! I felt like I was reading a sarcastic 7th grade science report. Give meteors something to do besides nothing, then die. Even then, you should make the death/fiery explosion part exciting! That's it! More excitement!
Prose and formatting:	6.5	Many of the sections are small, I noticed a couple red links, and there are a few grammar and speling errors. Just tidy up a bit, and if you can, flesh out your ideas more (for more length)
Images:	4	There was only one image, and it was small and not very funny. To fix this, go to Google and type in 'Meteor' in the image search bar. You'll get more than the paltry offering I found in the article. I trust you know how to upload (it's a link in the toolbox (far left sidebar area)). It's not so hard.
Miscellaneous:	5.3	Avg'd.
Final Score:	26.3	This isn't up to Uncyc standards yet, but if you work at it (emphasis on "work", "at", and "it") I can see a very decent article here.
Reviewer:	• • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:59, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Navigation menu