Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Boxes

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Boxes

This is by the I like cheese. Just comment. Please. Thank you, if you do.

UU, READ THE FUCKING GUIDELINES PLEASE. THANK YOU, IF YOU DO.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 19 / 21:37)

I FUCKING DID! BLAME THE NOOB WHO ACTUALLY SUBMITTED IT. If you are yelling at me for the content and my scoring, BITE ME. It had some serious issues and I was informative AND supportive. Why must you insist to yell at me in front of the children?-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 03:04, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	5	Well it seems you were trying to poke fun at the pointlessness of talking about boxes, but I personally believe you will do much better if you write an article in the style of a serious documentary on the wonderful world of boxes and make it subtle in humor. You should read HTBFANJS for ideas. Fairly good for a first article.
Concept:	7.5	Uncyclopedia does not have an article on boxes!?!? You, yes you, have created an important article that unc needs. Your approach, however, needs some development, which may take some time to develop. Good job.
Prose and formatting:	5	No big formatting errors, but your sections are way too short. Add some subsections, like in an outline. (D'oh! It is an outline after all!)
Images:	6	Appropriate images, but something is missing. Think of some funnier captions than those you have written.
Miscellaneous:	5.9	boxes are not boring! Turn this "boring" article on boxes into something hilarious! Ask me or any other users for help if you need help writing it.
Final Score:	29.4	Don't be disappointed by your low score. Your a noob. Guess what? WE ALL WERE NOOBS!!!I am one too! I would recommend that you check out AAN to get yourself a mentor, so you too can write VFH worthy articles.
Reviewer:	-- Sir Unknown User (Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN) 01:44, 16 December 2007 (UTC)