Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Biology (2nd review)

Looking for an in-depth review. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I really hated doing Biology in school, so I'll have a lot of fun with this one. InMooseWeTrust 00:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Humour:	2	You only get a two because you used the other meaning of the word. While it provides an initial chuckle, the article itself isn't funny at all.
Concept:	3	It's a good initial idea, but you have to build on it a lot more. That means instead of just making it an article about what else Biology could mean, find some way to make it funny.
Prose and formatting:	9	Even if you can't be funny, it's obvious that you can write well. It would be nice if you could use this skill to clean up some poorly written articles all over Uncyclopedia.
Images:	6	Well, you have pictures that are appropriate for the article. However, they don't add to the irony or the humor of the article itself.
Miscellaneous:	3	I was looking at the Footnotes for this section. There's nothing in it I can like.
Final Score:	23	For the reasons I mentioned, this is bad as a Wikipedia article and even worse as an Uncyclopedia article. I hate to have to do this, but I'm nominating it for deletion.
Reviewer:	InMooseWeTrust 11:39, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Navigation menu