UnNews talk:Article gets +21 votes on VFH

1. This belongs here. It's informative and well written, just not funny.
2. Other articles have surpassed 20 votes in the past.
3. I was the one who nommed that article. I deserve some recognition.
4. ????
5. Profit!

—Sir SysRq (talk) 03:25, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I shoe-horned you into the article, and I think its been a while since we got past a +20 score. Also, I think it might be a bit long for unSignpost, although I did filibuster a bit. How would I go about moving it.--Mnbvcxz 03:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Would it be the ultimate meta-occurence if this was nominated on VFH and received more than 21 votes? I propose: yes. IronLung 08:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I remember Why?:Am I a Power Ranger? getting +21 votes once, wich was considered very exceptional at the time. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 09:31, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Bring it on over here. —Sir SysRq (talk) 16:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Modus doesn't have a problem a problem with the article, its more of an exhortation to vote than a vanity article. It's much better than Modus is the worst. --Mnbvcxz 16:34, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say there was any real problem with it, I just felt that UnSignpost was a better venue for it, since it's an informative part of Uncyc history rather than satire. Now, if this were, say, "Modus' first feature ever on Uncyc gets 2+ votes" then I could see it being UnNews. But that's just my opinion; if Modus feels otherwise, then he is wrong. —Sir SysRq (talk) 19:23, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Awsome! I was just gonna come over here and whore that article after reading this title but someone else remembers it too. That's made my day that has. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 06:43 9 January 2009