Talk:Worst 100 Quick Detections that an Uncyclopedia page sucks of All Time
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Shouldn't this technically be Best 100? Because if they were worse they would not be true. I think a better title would be "Worst 100 Attributes of Uncyclopedia Articles" or something to that effect. -- 
05:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. One question before I try to move it (if possible)... Does moving cause all links to the article to become broken? --Ж
WHEEEEE! 17:07, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- It's not necessary for everything to be the opposite of truth here. Sometimes truth can be funny too. Besides, if everything was named after it's opposite, things would get confusing (a page called Canada should be at least vaguely about Canada, not about whatever the opposite of Canada is. Damn Canadians...). Modusoperandi 17:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I started the list and named it 100 Quick Detections that an Uncyclopedia page sucks. Then someone added it to the Worst 100 list. Hence the odd name. --
Swami A. Suresh 21:29, 7 April 2006 (PDT)
- The weird name fits fine. Heck, I'm Modusoperandi...did you ever try getting on an airplane with a name like that? Actually, I just might change it to Worst Modusoperandi of All Time. Maybe not Modusoperandi 19:46, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: I started the list and named it 100 Quick Detections that an Uncyclopedia page sucks. Then someone added it to the Worst 100 list. Hence the odd name. --
- It's not necessary for everything to be the opposite of truth here. Sometimes truth can be funny too. Besides, if everything was named after it's opposite, things would get confusing (a page called Canada should be at least vaguely about Canada, not about whatever the opposite of Canada is. Damn Canadians...). Modusoperandi 17:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
