Talk:Unclear weapons
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review[edit source]
The title is a simple pun on nuclear weapons but I hope the article has enough in it to stand up by itself.
Humour: | 9 | Slow at first, but very funny with a great delivery in summation. |
Concept: | 10 | I like! |
Prose and formatting: | 6 | The biggest fault with this article. Some minor formatting errors. See here for a quick explanation on formatting so you can clean this up a little bit (again, it doesn't need a whole lot of work). Try to get rid of any red links too. Also, your article isn't categorized. |
Images: | 10 | A perfect ten in my book. Sure, they're not photoshopped, but the images go along great with the article. Captions are a bonus too. |
Miscellaneous: | 8 | Very Encyclopedic delivery with lots of consistency. |
Final Score: | 43 | Everything seems to tie together nicely. Good delivery, great concept, excellent pictures, but it just needs some touch-ups on the formatting. I might go as far as to suggest that I'd vote for your article if was nominated to be featured if you fixed the formatting a tad first. |
Reviewer: | --EMC [TALK] 21:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC) |
Great piece! Here's a fun fact for you: the name of the youngest son of King Priam of Troy was in fact Paris, which makes the 'Ancient usage' section so much more funtrue - don't know if you took this into account while writing the article, but yeah... --Thandruin 20:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC)