Talk:Sentence stopper thingy
thank you for edits braydie. Reverted a few things for formatting (nooo!) and stuff but kept most of your changes. Just needs more content. --AmericanBastard 09:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- (Just found this) You're welcome. —Braydie at 08:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
Needs a bit more content. Question: Is there any way I can incorporate the ASCII "." as an internal link for this article? --AmericanBastard 09:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Not bad, although if you're going to go with the SST thing, I think you'd be missing out if you ignored SST Records. - Lemon. 
22:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, Douché! --AmericanBastard 06:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ein Reich, ein Volk, ein over-used joke. Cut back on the Nazi refs.--Nydas 19:52, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- would but i've got like 3 jokes relying on the Nazis. Einstein+Fermi, stormtroopers, world's funniest joke (python ref.) Plus, I agree with Speilberg, Nazi's are just plain cool however trite they are around these parts. --AmericanBastard 03:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Made a few changes. "The NOoo!" thing was strictly for formatting purposes. Will bring this under more reparations once I finish the other articles i'm working on.
New Boxy thingy[edit source]
| Humor |
6/10 - I like the overall tone of the article and there are a lot of funny references there. However I'm not so sure about the ...No! thing. You've got some good stuff here, don't let cliched references (Hitler, Python etc) ruin the thing. |
| Concept |
6/10 - It's good that you choose never to mention the subject itself (ie. full stop), perhaps you might add a few 'other' names for the SST - eg. Small dot thing, thing that stops people from suffocating whilst reading prose. Perhaps develop into its own section? |
| Formatting and Prose |
6/10 - Good layout, on the whole. I'll add a few categroies and sort out that line spacing for you. |
| Images |
6/10 - The second image is great, but I'm always dubious of Hitler references. |
| Final Opinion |
24-40 - Good framework, with a bit more refining and another good picture can potentially be very good. |
| Comments |
|
This should be featured on the name alone.[edit source]
See above.