Talk:Science
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Science.
| ||
---|---|---|
|
Article policies
|
Rewrite[edit source]
I have completely rewritten this page from the ground up (the scientology slant was boring and stupid). I need help with it, and there will be much to add in the coming days. Specifically, a mathematical formula spelling "why you be hatin'?" in symbols would be awesome, but other changes are certainly welcome.--Sultanofsurreal 02:13, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
I rewrote this article, because the old version's scientology slant was utterly boring. I'd like someone who knows how to manipulate the mathematical formula button to make a formula which spells "Dolemite why you be hatin'?" in calculus-y symbols. And definitely needs more content; new sections and more added to the already-existing "history" section. --Sultanofsurreal 02:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
It looked pretty blank so I put up some images. --Jives 19:44, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
Humour: | 4 | Irony is not just writing things counterways. There are some good moments, but at the most the humor is "2+2=5" style. |
Concept: | 2 | Well, this have to do with things I really like and believe, so it's personal. But the author seems that kind of pinko anti-science cultural relativist (as your antropology college teacher that exhaled an exotic herbal musk). "Science was made mainly by white men, so it must be wrong". |
Prose and formatting: | 3 | I'm sorry to say that I almost could not read it until the end. |
Images: | 3 | Cheesy fifties sci-fi would do miracles here. |
Miscellaneous: | 5 | Needs rework, but it's relatively well stitched to its proposal. |
Final Score: | 17 | Don't take this personally, I just hated the initial concept by personal reasons. I'm a science geek level 20 atheist, the kind that carries a Charles Darwin card on the wallet... |
Reviewer: | herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 16:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC) |