Talk:Pae Do

As far as I can tell, the "vandalism" of this page consists of User A removing a link to a Wikipedia user page, and User B reinstating it. The link probably should not be there in the first place. Discuss it here and someone will be along to ban everybody unprotect the page presently. --—rc (t) 18:43, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Technically RCmurphy's just of the vandalism is correct. However, as the page on Wikipedia is also being attacked by the same host, 62.254.0.18, for no explicable reason - it is curious as to why the wikipedia entry probably shouldn't be there. 217.155.251.134 18:50, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Why shouldn't the link to Wikipedia be there? Because it's technically against our vanity policies. If you're talking about the page(s) on Wikipedia, I have no idea. Take it up with them. --—rc (t) 21:05, 26 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I'm unprotecting the page. Do not put the contested link back in unless you discuss it on this talk page first. --—rc (t) 19:32, 27 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Mine.

Famine gave me the task of fixin' up this page, and he scares me. So I'm gonna. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)