Talk:Overclocking
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review[edit source]
Hi there. I made this article, and actually didn't have an account until I saw this pee review. I appreciate your concern for my article, but who the hell put in all the stupid ayz, and why are there links to non-existent pages? 1337_sauce
- O. Yeah. That was me. :P As for non-existant links, there's a lot of those on many pages, because, eventally, if a non-existant page has enough pages linking to it, someone might get off their ass and make a page on it. I'll take out the "extras", if you want. Dark Ermac 13:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
This is not my article. I'm just trying in vain(?) to save it from deletion. Any help is greatly appreciated. --Pentium5dot1 03:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- I see some (constructive) anon edits to the article
, but no review. Should I leave this pee here a little while longer? Pentium5dot1 04:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)- Leave it as long as needed. 69.48.16.210 13:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Um, you do know that you're allowed to put in zero as a score component for the Pee Review, right? Pentium5dot1 17:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I do now-Retrofuture42 18:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Leave it as long as needed. 69.48.16.210 13:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- The 1337 is too easy and expected. I'd maybe define overclocking as something more literal, like tricking out the speed of the desktop clock or a variation between internal clock and desktop clock making the computer work harder to keep up. Not much of a suggestion, but the article needs a different direction. (Gir. 01:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC))
| Humour: | 4 | A bit better, still needs more content. |
| Concept: | 7 | Plenty of potential for nerdy computer humor here. |
| Prose and formatting: | 2 | Lose the 1337. |
| Images: | 4 | Quite funny, a couple more would make the article! |
| Miscellaneous: | 3 | More content needed! |
| Final Score: | 20 | Cleanup the prose and add more content in and a good article could come out of this. |
| Reviewer: | Retrofuture42 16:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC) | |
Re-Written[edit source]
Article Re-Writen--aldreneo 02:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Wow. The article is completely different topic now. Dark Ermac 13:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)